G-prep 雇佣成本上升

gonghao

they(costs) did(补齐)

完全可以锁定A 

kathy8446

不明白……

这题应该是上升的percentage比较没错，到底用lower还是less合适呢？不过上升lower，好像也不大通。但是感觉less也不好，比数字应该是small/great。

另外我到不觉得这里省略错了。Costs rose 2.8%.感觉是个主谓结构,2.8%应该不算宾语，更多有点副词的感觉吧？（概念不大清，如果错误请大家一定指出）如果是这样的话，就不用补出助动词啦。

以下是引用gonghao在2006-5-17 17:02:00的发言：

换句话说如果是precent的比较的话，

起码也得有代词，that/it

代词必须补出吗？？好像也见过省略得很干净的题目啊，如XYGWD1-16

Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.

 

1. a greater proportion than it was

2. a greater proportion than

3. a greater proportion than they have been

4. which is greater than was so

5. which is greater than it has been

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-9-4 21:00:40编辑过]

gonghao

看自己5月的帖子真是。。。。。。对不起观众了

这题其实挺明显的

前面是 costs rose

后面用 they 指代costs

did 应对 rose

A很好的答案

D，lower than后面没有东西

－－－－－－－－－－－－－

这里用high不合适

因为如果是具体的数字的话，可以使用high 和low

但是这里是上升了2.8，即成本上升的幅度，这里用more和less来做比较

gonghao

Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.

A.a greater proportion than it was

B.a greater proportion than

C.a greater proportion than they have been

D.which is greater than was so

E.which is greater than it has been

-----------------------------------

我是说如果这里是在比较precent的话，显然这里不是

－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－

对于这个题我不是很满意答案

A，it 指代costs

B.没有不出，OG里众多的例子都是补出的

C：时态不大对，虽然很像答案

D/E就不讨论了，非限制定从也出来了

kathy8446

对，上升幅度确实用“多/少，甚至是大/小”比较合适，low/high不合适。这个应该是这题关键所在

不过关于省略，我还是觉得只要没有歧义，省略是好的

谢谢gonghao版版解答：）