[求助]ＧＷＤ３０－２９

quanner

ＧＷＤ３０－２９

Researchers agreed that the study of new treatments for heart attack patients was extremely important but more research was needed to determine that balloon angioplasty preceded with ultrasound was or was not any better for heart attack patients than the balloon procedure by itself.

1. more research was needed to determine that balloon angioplasty preceded with ultrasound was or was not any better for heart attack patients than


2. more research was needed for determining whether or not balloon angioplasty preceded by ultrasound is any better for heart attack patients than is


3. that more research was needed to determine whether balloon angioplasty preceded by ultrasound is any better for heart attack patients than


4. that more research was needed to determine that balloon angioplasty preceded with ultrasound was any better for heart attack patients than


5. that more research was needed for determining that balloon angioplasty preceded by ultrasound is or is not any better for heart attack patients than is

ＮＮ帮忙看看啊，Ｂ　or    C，　到底选哪个啊？！

晕了！

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-5-10 11:06:06编辑过]

香香茶

我不是NN，我选C，供你参考。原因如下：

C，that和but that平行，to determine比for determine要符合惯用法，whether比whether or not简洁，than后面的成分省略不会歧义。

quanner

Ｔhank you ,香香茶！

答案给的是Ｃ，还有一答案给的是Ｂ？！

我做的时候，一直在考虑两个问题：

一个是，既然是agreed，那应该用was还是is，
＂ balloon angioplasty preceded by ultrasound is any better for heart attack patients than....＂，可以看成一个普遍的规律如此之类的东东？

还有就是than 后的is需要补出来吗，前面有is和for，不会造成歧义吗？

香香茶

我觉得这个是要决定而尚未决定的，to determine有这个含义，所以可以用is.我不认为这是一个类似于普遍规律之类的东东。

than后面的is,可以不用补出来。因为很明显是与balloon比较而非与for后面的成分比较，再说by itself也可以加强了这种意义，不会歧义。

quanner

以下是引用香香茶在2006-5-10 11:34:00的发言：

我觉得这个是要决定而尚未决定的，to determine有这个含义，所以可以用is.我不认为这是一个类似于普遍规律之类的东东。

than后面的is,可以不用补出来。因为很明显是与balloon比较而非与for后面的成分比较，再说by itself也可以加强了这种意义，不会歧义。

１．ＯＧ２１５～A and B use the indicative verb rewards, whereas the logic of the sentence demands the conditional would reward (what Parliament believes to be the undue rewarding of illegal immigrants has not actually taken place but is considered only as an outcome of a hypothetical action)

我一直以为未确定的事是用虚拟的，比如would；是我搞错概念了吗？

２．虽然知道意思，可是，一直强调不要有歧义；所以，老觉得补出比不补出好！

　　

香香茶

我觉得我说的决定和你说的确定不是一码事。可能是我没说清楚，题目的意思是：需要更多的研究工作来决定哪个更好。而这个决定后面的内容是尚未发生的，所以用一般现在时。另外，我觉得这里不存在假设，和你举的例子是不同的。

只要没有歧义，就不用补出。简洁，精确都是GMAT的考点。

quanner

哦,3x!

我再想想!

 

gonghao

more research was needed to determine that balloon angioplasty preceded with ultrasound was or was not any better for heart attack patients than
    

1.was or was not 显的复杂，whether简洁，肯定也是更好的选择，排除ADE

2. need 。。。 to do比起need for doing更好，排除B

正确选项C

quanner

恩,谢谢gonghao!

清楚了,做的时候给的两个答案!

又想想补出IS也没错,所以犯糊涂了!

省略的问题,还是没掌握透!

gonghao

1.一个是，既然是agreed，那应该用was还是is，
＂ balloon angioplasty preceded by ultrasound is any better for heart attack patients than....＂，可以看成一个普遍的规律如此之类的东东？

首先agreed 的时态已经在下面两处体现出来了，对于还没有出现的more research用was是不合适的

Researchers agreed that the study of new treatments for heart attack patients was extremely important but more research was needed to determine that balloon angioplasty preceded with ultrasound was or was not any better for heart attack patients than the balloon procedure by itself.

2.是than 后的is需要补出来吗，前面有is和for，不会造成歧义吗？

不会歧异。因为for+人 ；than 如果歧异的话后面的东西应该和人一致，显然不一致，也没划线，不考虑了：）另外by onself是个标志，很难造成歧异

that more research was needed to determine whether balloon angioplasty preceded by ultrasound
            is any better for heart attack patients than
        the balloon procedure by itself.