GWD26-20

lxzjojo

这一题偶的看法:

A中的they指代不清，排除。

C逻辑不对，一周6小时，这是一个频率，不能were spent，in 1997也不好。

D用了compared with,改变了句子意思。

E中的growing很怪异，不知作何成份，而且改变句子意思。

roric

以下是引用入画在2006-4-22 13:07:00的发言：

如果可以用过去完成时，A为什么不行呢？

E  怎么改变逻辑了呢？

D 的错误是不是分词有修饰前面名词chores的歧异。

C 我觉得不好，具体有什么语法错误呢？

谢谢

我觉得compared with在比较中总是用在主语和compared with 后面名词比较时，我觉得这个compared with已经有点像like/unlike了，不是去修是前面的名词，而是主语。这里主语显然不能比较。

参考下：

GWD3-Q39:

Minivans carry as many as seven passengers and, compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less, get better gas mileage, allow passengers to get in and out more easily, and have a smoother ride.

 

A.     Minivans carry as many as seven passengers and, compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less,

B.     Minivans, which carry as many as seven passengers, compared with most sport utility vehicles, they cost less,

C.     Minivans carry as many as seven passengers, in comparison with most sport utility vehicles, and have a lower cost, they

D.     Minivans, carrying as many as seven passengers, compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less,

E.      Minivans, which carry as many as seven passengers, compared with most sport utility vehicles the cost is lower, and they

  

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GWD1-Q7:

A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times in 1980.

 

1. that CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times

2. that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times

3. that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio

4. CEO’s who now earn on average 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio

5. CEO’s now earning an average of 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, compared to the ratio of 42 times

iamxiaocao2003

以下是引用roric在2006-11-7 19:51:00的发言：

我觉得compared with在比较中总是用在主语和compared with 后面名词比较时，我觉得这个compared with已经有点像like/unlike了，不是去修是前面的名词，而是主语。这里主语显然不能比较。

参考下：

GWD3-Q39:

Minivans carry as many as seven passengers and, compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less, get better gas mileage, allow passengers to get in and out more easily, and have a smoother ride.

 

 

A.     Minivans carry as many as seven passengers and, compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less,

B.     Minivans, which carry as many as seven passengers, compared with most sport utility vehicles, they cost less,

C.     Minivans carry as many as seven passengers, in comparison with most sport utility vehicles, and have a lower cost, they

D.     Minivans, carrying as many as seven passengers, compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less,

E.      Minivans, which carry as many as seven passengers, compared with most sport utility vehicles the cost is lower, and they

  

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GWD1-Q7:

A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times in 1980.

 

 

1. that CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times

2. that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times

3. that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio

4. CEO’s who now earn on average 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio

5. CEO’s now earning an average of 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, compared to the ratio of 42 times

MM解释的真好！我正朦朦胧胧的有此想法，被MM肯定了，好开心！

yl1004

yl1004

six hours a week一个频率：一周六小时，这样的话，要were干嘛

另外【一周六小时】这样一个频率可以被spent吗？

只能说spent six hours weekly或者spent six hours in one week

再或者就是six hours were spent in one week但是如果是这样的结构，后面的by一定要出来，否则就显的意思怪异

对不起不会用引用

我刚刚查了一下，可以说什么被spend

nearly 3.7 hours a week was spent on Assembly,从剑桥大学的网站上查到的（search whereas nearly six hours a week were spent in 1997 in google UK

我觉得这道题选C,1981年用的过去式，难道1997年发生的事比1981年的是发生的早，显然不符合逻辑，所以我觉得用一般过去式好，而且符合句意

jiefu

同意yl1004,本人也觉得应该是C,

但E错在哪里呢? 看成同位语的独立主格结构可以啊.

想了想,还应该是C. 应为B/E的问题出在FIGURE上, FIGURE不能对应前面的真正核心词HOUR

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-12-3 14:07:47编辑过]

cccccc0

虽然已开始我选的C，但是现在想想看还是B比较的好，

B OG中强调的是主句用过去时，从句中国去完成时的形势，而这里是两个不同的句子，所以不存在OG中场出现的那种情况的

C中的whereas用的比较的奇怪，把原句中好端端的并列结构，改成了对比了，改变了巨资的意思的

D中的compared逻辑主语错，

E中的that figure growing to nearly six hours a week in 1997是独立主格，但是改变了原来句子的结构

cccccc0

ding~~~快来讨论~~

jsj_gill

以下是引用yl1004在2006-12-2 11:19:00的发言：

我觉得这道题选C,1981年用的过去式，难道1997年发生的事比1981年的是发生的早，显然不符合逻辑，所以我觉得用一般过去式好，而且符合句意

偶觉得是选B，因为在

B. chores; by 1997 that figure had grown to nearly

six hours a week

中，用了“；”因此，我认为1997不是与1981作时间对比，而是与目前做对比，因此要用had done的形式。

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-1-6 23:24:58编辑过]

sabrina07

up