ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2358|回复: 11
打印 上一主题 下一主题

救命!要晕死了!!OG92 vs OG198

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-3-5 20:23:00 | 只看该作者

救命!要晕死了!!OG92 vs OG198

92. Never before had taxpayers confronted so many


changes at once as they had in the Tax Reform Act of 1986.



(A)  so many changes at once as they had in



(B)  at once as many changes as



(C)  at once as many changes that there were with



(D)  as many changes at once as they confronted in



(E)   so many changes at once that confronted them in


198. Although Napoleon’s army entered LACE w:st="on">RussiaLACE> with far more supplies than they had in their previous campaigns, it had provisions for only twenty-four days.


(A) they had in their previous campaigns


(B) their previous campaigns had had


(C) they had for any previous campaign


(D) in their previous campaigns


(E) for any previous campaign


都是为同一动作不同时态比较.看完讨论帖,我也不明白198中到底省略的是个啥?是(supplies) for any previous campaign 还是 than it had had for any previous campain,还是than the supplies it had had for any previous campaign?


如果按照189省略的那么彻底,那么OG92  as many changes at once as in  the Tax Reform Act of 1986是否可以接受?


真的晕死我了.救命!!!

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2006-3-9 11:39:00 | 只看该作者
顶啊.救命
板凳
发表于 2006-3-9 14:21:00 | 只看该作者

than the supplies it had had for any previous campaign

地板
发表于 2006-3-9 14:29:00 | 只看该作者

如果按照189省略的那么彻底,那么OG92  as many changes at once as in  the Tax Reform Act of 1986是否可以接受?



I personally think it is ok.  'They had' would be understood.  That is why this is not one of the choices.  

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-3-9 19:05:00 | 只看该作者
非常谢谢
6#
发表于 2006-3-9 19:42:00 | 只看该作者

personally,两题不同在于:第二句有一个with的伴随状况,所以它不存在动词的省略问题,而是省略的整个句子。。。。。。with supplies for any previous campaign,是两个不同状况的比较。

7#
发表于 2006-3-9 19:43:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用xuedidage在2006-3-9 14:29:00的发言:


如果按照189省略的那么彻底,那么OG92  as many changes at once as in  the Tax Reform Act of 1986是否可以接受?


I personally think it is ok.  'They had' would be understood.  That is why this is not one of the choices.  


I agree,too

8#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-3-9 21:15:00 | 只看该作者

看了讨论又觉得不可省略了.原因:比较的时态不同不可省略.否则补足后就变成了一样的时态  例:


89.   A recent national study of the public schools shows that there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were four years ago.


(A) there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were


(B) there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were


(C) there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many as there were


(D) every thirty-two pupils now have one microcomputer, four times as many than there wereC


(E) every thirty-two pupils now has one microcomputer, four times as many as


265. Thomas Eakins’ powerful style and his choices of subject—the advances in modern surgery, the discipline of sport, the strains of individuals in tension with society or even with themselves—was as disturbing to his own time as it is compelling for ours.


(A) was as disturbing to his own time as it is


(B) were as disturbing to his own time as they are


(C) has been as disturbing in his own time as they are


(D) had been as disturbing in his own time as it wasB


(E) have been as disturbing in his own time as


如果省略, 后面补足就表示were as disturbing to his own time as (they were)..那么时态就不对了.


这个总结对否?


不知各位怎么看? 谁来解答一下..

9#
发表于 2006-3-10 13:40:00 | 只看该作者

Hey, amber0919.  I appreciate you finding these example.  


I forgot to say that I read, for certain, from NN that what you said is true.  We can only omit when subject and verb are the same and in the same tense.  

10#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-3-10 19:04:00 | 只看该作者
xuedidageGG,谢谢你的回答.这样的话,OG上的题基本都可以用这个规则解释啦.那几个时态不同的题目OG都没有省去主谓.又解除了个心头大疑.谢谢你!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-7 11:00
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部