ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: isuffering
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[SC总结] 总结:代词指代,就近指代 or按逻辑意思指代?

[精华] [复制链接]
21#
发表于 2006-8-4 12:22:00 | 只看该作者
是阿,以上Q83正確選項的(C)中的it就是指代賓語condition, 而非原題主語。A medical test。所以這題算是打破了代名詞多帶原題主語的定律,對嗎? 請牛牛指教。
[此贴子已经被作者于2006-8-4 12:22:53编辑过]
22#
发表于 2006-11-8 09:49:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用isuffering在2003-9-19 12:59:00的发言:
总结:代词指代,就近指代 or按逻辑意思指代?

在总结时发现代词指代很值得讨论:
观点:代词指代按逻辑意思指代,而非就近指代;
有的表面上看是就近指代,但根本还是按逻辑意思来指代。

1. 代词指代按逻辑意思指代,而非就近指代。
举例:XDF-S7-T24,XDF-S12-T21

XDF-S7-T24
24. Several years ago the diet industry introduced a variety of appetite suppressants, but some of these drugs caused stomach disorders severe enough to have them banned by the Food and Drug Administration.
(A) stomach disorders severe enough to have them
(B) stomach disorders that were severe enough so they were
(C) stomach disorders of such severity so as to be
(D) such severe stomach disorders that they were
(E) such severe stomach disorders as to be
The answer is D.
其中
but some of these drugs caused such severe stomach disorders that they were banned by the Food and Drug Administration.
“they ” 按逻辑意思指代drugs,而非就近指代。

XDF-S12-T21
21. The filibuster, a parliamentary device that slows the snail’s pace that prevails even in the best of times in congressional sessions and tests the endurance of everyone associated with it, seems more and more an anachronism in the age of telecommunications.
(A) sessions and tests the endurance of everyone associated with it, seems
(B) sessions and tests the endurance of everyone who is associated with it, seeming to be
(C) sessions, tests the endurance of everyone associated with it, seems
(D) sessions, that tests the endurance of everyone associated with it and seems
(E) sessions, testing the endurance of everyone associated with it and seeming

The answer is A.

其中
a parliamentary device that slows( the snail’s pace that prevails even in the best of times in congressional sessions) and tests ( the endurance of everyone associated with it)

即a parliamentary device that slows …and tests…
it按逻辑意思指代 a parliamentary device , 而非就近指代。

2.有的表面上看是就近指代,但根本还是按逻辑意思来指代。
举例:XDF-S12-T20,XDF-补充材料-T230

XDF-S12-T20
20. In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no contest to criminal charges of odometer tampering and agreed to pay more than $16 million in civil damages for cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected.
(A) cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected
(B) cars that it had test-driven with their disconnected odometers
(C) its cars having been test-driven with disconnected odometers
(D) having test-driven cars with their odometers disconnected
(E) having cars that were test-driven with disconnected odometers

The answer is D.

Sb. pay sth. for having test-driven cars with their odometers disconnected.

其中with their odometers disconnected 作定语,修饰cars;
their 按逻辑意思指代cars.
虽然满足就近指代, 但根本还是按逻辑意思来指代。

XDF-补充材料-T230
230. In an effort to reduce their inventories, Italian vintners have cut prices; their wines have been priced to sell, and they are.
(A) have been priced to sell, and they are
(B) are priced to sell, and they have
(C) are priced to sell, and they do
(D) are being priced to sell, and have
(E) had been priced to sell, and they have

The answer is C.

其中their wines are priced to sell, and they do.
“they” 按逻辑意思指代wines.
虽然满足就近指代, 但根本还是按逻辑意思来指代。
注意:这里同一句中的their, they 并没有指代同一名词.

their指代前面的Vintners, 而they 指代wines.
      
结论:代词指代按逻辑意思指代,而非就近指代;
有的表面上看是就近指代,但根本还是按逻辑意思来指代。

抛砖引玉, 欢迎讨论。




不同意红字部分的观点,我的观点是这样的:

they和their都是指代vinters,这一条新东方的石林曾经讲过,虽然我对于石林的很多荒谬观点并不认同,但是这条我完全认同:在商业正式文件中,原则上一个句子中的代词(譬如their和they)只能指代同一个事物!


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-11-8 9:49:58编辑过]
23#
发表于 2006-11-12 08:06:00 | 只看该作者

楼上,they do完整的形式是they do sell,我记得新东方上课的时候说,they指代wines,不过和你不是同一个老师。

24#
发表于 2007-7-22 21:45:00 | 只看该作者
thank you
25#
发表于 2007-12-23 17:38:00 | 只看该作者

代词按照逻辑关系指代??楼主的观点应该有个前提:代词指代不是本题的考点。

如果楼主这一观点成立的话,所有的代词自动找到逻辑关系上的名词,

那么还有代词的“指代混淆”这一错误吗?(单复数错误除外)

26#
发表于 2008-6-15 17:27:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用GMMBA在2007-12-23 17:38:00的发言:

代词按照逻辑关系指代??楼主的观点应该有个前提:代词指代不是本题的考点。

如果楼主这一观点成立的话,所有的代词自动找到逻辑关系上的名词,

那么还有代词的“指代混淆”这一错误吗?(单复数错误除外)

此观点很有意思,我也想问一下,何为逻辑关系指代?在考试中有何规律可循?

27#
发表于 2008-6-15 18:07:00 | 只看该作者

其实 ETS对代词指代的规律也没有定论,XDF 说的也不准,还是每道题具体分析吧


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-6-15 18:07:03编辑过]
28#
发表于 2008-6-22 06:14:00 | 只看该作者
我觉得也是,代词指代不是考点。。而是分析的时候加进去的
29#
发表于 2008-8-19 11:07:00 | 只看该作者
白勇的语法书说了代词的指代顺序
在并列句中:有2个或3个句子并列,第二或第三个句子中的袋子应优先指代第一句中主句的名词。

我现在做题就中了这个误区,看见代词就心紧,都忽略其他考点了
30#
发表于 2009-2-11 06:19:00 | 只看该作者

thanks so much

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-29 01:51
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部