以下是引用Snazzy在2004-1-3 6:50:00的发言: 1, A, B verb ... here B is subject. A is modifier. eg: Peasant
2, A, B, verb ... here A is subject. B is modifier
they are different
关于同位语修饰 同意snazzy
补充一点
1, A, B verb ... here B is subject. A is modifier. eg:OG56,Architects and stonemasons, the Maya built huge palace and temple clusters without the benefit of animal transport or the wheel
2, A, B, verb ... here A is subject. B is modifier eg. More than thirty years ago Dr. Barbara Mc-Clintock, the Nobel Prize winner, reported that genes can “jump,” like pearls moving mysteriously from one necklace to another
LZMp311
同位语修饰中,1。替代物与被替代物要属同类,具有可替代性,2。替代物的内涵要大于被替代物的内涵,也就是说,被替代物是替代物的一个子集。
Eg. The use of a single strain of plant for a given crop over a wide area, a practice fostered by modern seed-marketing methods, increase the likelihood that the impact of single crop disease or pest will be disastrous.
所以如果改为
the Maya 逗号Architects and stonemasons built huge palace and temple clusters without the benefit of animal transport or the wheel
不合逻辑
如果改为
the Maya 逗号Architects and stonemasons 逗号built huge palace and temple clusters without the benefit of animal transport or the wheel
可行
另外我有一个疑问
. E is awkwardly phrased and produces a sentence fragment, because the appositive noun phrase Architects and stonemasons cannot serve as the subject of were the Maya. (这句中主表概念不对等,就是会不符合逻辑 为何OG说句子不完整
谢谢.
[此贴子已经被作者于2004-6-23 7:07:41编辑过] |