以下是引用seasnow在2006-1-18 13:58:00的发言:50. That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said that it their fault: Aivin Toffler, one of the most prominent students of the future, did not even mention microcomputers in Future Shock, published in 1970. (A) That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said that it is their fault 我觉得这里的主语从句和宾语从句中的it有重复之嫌 (B) That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said to be at fault 这里的主语是That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology,其余的部分can hardly be said to be at fault,那么句意是这个事件to be at fault,逻辑上就说不通,因为应该to be at fault的其实是educators (C) It can hardly be said that it is the fault of educators who have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology 这里who从句修饰educators,这样这个句子说at fault的是educators,但是没有说明那些educators是由于who从句中的事件at fault的 (D) It can hardly be said that educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology (E) The fact that educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said 主语太长,头重脚轻;the fact累赘 感觉C比较顺口。这道题怎么做呢? 一点想法 欢迎指正^ ^ |