ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

The automotive conveyor-belt system, which Henry Ford modeled after an assembly-line technique introduced by Ransom Olds, reduced from a day and a half to 93 minutes the required time of assembling a Model T.

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 7351|回复: 17

[讨论]OG11-044

[复制链接]
发表于 2006-1-18 13:12:00 | 显示全部楼层

[讨论]OG11-044

44.   The automotive conveyor-belt system, which Henry Ford modeled after an assembly-line technique introduced by Ransom Olds, reduced from a day and a half to 93 minutes the required time of assembling a Model T.

(A)   from a day and a half to 93 minutes the required time of assembling a Model T

(B)   the time being required to assemble a Model T, from a day and a half down to 93 minutes

(C)   the time being required to assemble a Model T, a day and a half to 93 minutes

(D)  the time required to assemble a Model T from a day and a half to 93 minutes

(E)   from a day and a half to 93 minutes, the time required for the assembling of a Model T

选D?


发表于 2006-1-18 13:58:00 | 显示全部楼层

D


reduce后直接跟宾语the time

发表于 2006-5-27 15:52:00 | 显示全部楼层

如果把D选项改成reduce the required time to assemble a Motor T from a day and a half to 93 mins. 还是正确的吗?

还有B选项的解释中“the comma is unnecessary" , 这里我理解的事from a day and a half to 93 min 是time 的同位语, 如果加上了标点,那么会造成歧义。

发表于 2006-5-27 16:56:00 | 显示全部楼层
以下是引用当当84在2006-5-27 15:52:00的发言:

如果把D选项改成reduce the required time to assemble a Motor T from a day and a half to 93 mins. 还是正确的吗?

还有B选项的解释中“the comma is unnecessary" , 这里我理解的事from a day and a half to 93 min 是time 的同位语, 如果加上了标点,那么会造成歧义。

那个,改成你这样的我都不知道这句话的意思了。

提醒LZ,SC也要求逻辑合理。

发表于 2007-1-18 12:53:00 | 显示全部楼层
why is "required" follow by "to" is correct, but follow by "of" is incorrect. Thank you.
发表于 2007-1-18 15:36:00 | 显示全部楼层
以下是引用当当84在2006-5-27 15:52:00的发言:

如果把D选项改成reduce the required time to assemble a Motor T from a day and a half to 93 mins. 还是正确的吗?

还有B选项的解释中“the comma is unnecessary" , 这里我理解的事from a day and a half to 93 min 是time 的同位语, 如果加上了标点,那么会造成歧义。

把time放后面似乎也没错,但是一般定语后置的,因为会产生歧义:可能意思会理解为:为了assemble a .....而reduce the required time.

发表于 2007-2-10 17:35:00 | 显示全部楼层

不懂“the comma is unnecessary" ,NN能具体解释下吗?!

3q

发表于 2007-3-27 02:41:00 | 显示全部楼层
顶,同样的问题!
发表于 2007-10-28 16:15:00 | 显示全部楼层

字典里的确有require of sth的用法,具体参考牛津字典第六版,1474页。

难道说of 后面不能接-ing形式的动名词?

发表于 2007-11-10 21:42:00 | 显示全部楼层
以下是引用lovegmat在2007-1-18 12:53:00的发言:
why is "required" follow by "to" is correct, but follow by "of" is incorrect. Thank you.

同理,require for sth.是正确的么?

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-3-29 01:13
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部