[讨论]OG11th-8

flourishi

对于主语是rising inventories还是inventories还是不怎么清楚，从句意上理解，感觉前者更合适，即“存货的增加，当不能伴随销售的相应增加时。。。”，可根据OG的解释，主语却是inventories。

继续顶

Zspirit

非谓语动词只有动名词和不定式能做主语。Rising在这里肯定不是动名词，所以只能是现在分词，修饰主语inventories，表示主语正在处于的一个状态。所以主语是invertories。

明白了“伴随sales还是伴随increase”的分析，但是还是没明白为什么说“Rising inventories与Corresponding increase是平行的”？形式上确实是平行的，但逻辑意思却看不出来啊

初来乍到，请各位NN多多关照

youyou3941

我是这样理解的。rise是不及物动词，不能直接加宾语。raise是及物动词，可直接加宾语。所以Rising inventories里的rising肯定不是动词，同意楼上的为定语，意思是正在增长种的inventories。

fangxia76

请问can和possibly能否互换？多谢。

tongchenl

大家一定要仔细看看16楼的解释，仔细看，会有豁然开朗的感觉的～～～

reallingling

以下是引用seasnow在2006-1-15 12:41:00的发言：

8.             Rising inventories, when unaccompanied correspondingly by increases in sales, can lead to production cutbacks that would hamper economic growth,

(A)    when unaccompanied correspondingly by increases in sales, can lead

(B)     when not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, possibly leads

(C)    when they were unaccompanied by corresponding sales increases, can lead

(D)    if not accompanied by correspondingly increased sales, possibly leads

(E)     if not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, can lead

选D，平行结构？对吗？

choos e

comparing d with e, it will be easily find that in choice d , the verb "leads" does not accord with the subject " inventories"

sky85

以下是引用oncross在2006-7-4 4:23:00的发言：

Did MM refer to OG10-37:

37.   While some academicians believe that business ethics should be integrated into every business course, others say that students will take ethics seriously only if it would be taught as a separately required course.

(A) only if it would be taught as a separately required course

(B) only if it is taught as a separate, required course

(C) if it is taught only as a course required separately

(D) if it was taught only as a separate and required course（B）

(E) if it would only be taught as a required course, separately

Also, the intended meaning is distorted when the adverb separately is used to modify required, as in A and C, or taught, as in E; B correctly uses the adjective separate to modify course.

Some thoughts:

Rising inventories: an ongoing action

increased sales: a finished action, more focus on the "increased" state rather than the increase action.

Thus, corresponding increase is prefered to correspondingly increased to match with rising.

太强大了!赞!

菠萝猫

16楼很强，吃得很透

miracle626

以下是引用Zspirit在2008-4-18 18:47:00的发言：

非谓语动词只有动名词和不定式能做主语。Rising在这里肯定不是动名词，所以只能是现在分词，修饰主语inventories，表示主语正在处于的一个状态。所以主语是invertories。

明白了“伴随sales还是伴随increase”的分析，但是还是没明白为什么说“Rising inventories与Corresponding increase是平行的”？形式上确实是平行的，但逻辑意思却看不出来啊

初来乍到，请各位NN多多关照

为什么rising inventries就不能看成是动名词呢？ 因为rising inventries 是 ongoing action,所以rising不可能是用来修饰Inventries的阿，这样就不是action了

aleckwang

试着用另一种思路解释下主语问题。

本体的主干是rising inventories can lead to production cutbacks. 即rising inventories 可能导致产量下降。

对比下面两种主语：

如果rising inventories是主语，那么就是“增加库存”这个动作，可能导致产量下降。

如果inventories是主语，那么就是“增长的库存”，如果没有销售的相应的增长，可能导致产量下降。

所以应该是“库存”导致产量下降，而不是动作导致产量下降。

欢迎讨论。