ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: kevinZhang
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[SC总结] OG11-045,大全987没有,手敲录入,诚心请教!

[复制链接]
41#
发表于 2007-1-17 17:52:00 | 只看该作者

这里的that引导的从句怎么可能是宾语从句呢?难道宾语从句不是直接在谓语后的吗?但我觉得似乎这里也不是限定性定语从句,因为我觉得似乎confidence在这句话里面不做成分,之所以不能把that弄掉会不会因为这里that引导的是同位语呢?貌似同位语的感觉,希望nn指教

42#
发表于 2007-1-28 10:30:00 | 只看该作者

我也觉得第一个that应该是同位语从句,坚决支持楼上的!但还有一点问题这里的第二个that应该是在其引导的从句中做宾语吧?是否省掉也可以?

43#
发表于 2007-2-11 12:00:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用足球幽灵在2006-7-24 7:07:00的发言:

“og对C选项的解释中说instead to come does not complete the second part of the sentence idiomatically不太理解”

同问,谢谢指教

是不是和句子的省略有关?

顶上去!!!

44#
发表于 2007-4-8 17:24:00 | 只看该作者

5.        As its sales of computer products have surpassed those of measuring instruments, the company has become increasingly willing to compete for the mass market sales
            they would in the past have
            conceded to rivals.

(A)         they would in the past have conceded to rivals

(B)         they would have conceded previously to their rivals

(C)        that in the past would have been conceded previously to rivals

(D)        it previously would have conceded to rivals in the past

(E)         it would in the past have conceded to rivals

Agreement + Rhetorical construction

When a number of words intervene between a pronoun and its referent, an error such as the one in this sentence is easy to make. The subject of the main clause is the singular noun company, which must be followed by the singular pronoun it.

A          Plural pronoun they does not agree with singular the company

B          Plural pronouns they and their do not agree with the company

C         Previously repeats the idea of in the past, the passive voice construction is weak and ambiguous

D         Use of both previously and in the past is redundant

E          Correct. In this concise sentence, the singular pronoun it agrees with the singular referent the company.

OG11-05也是省略了定语从句的that引导词.

似乎省略that多半都是在OG11上,那么可不可以设想是从10版到11版的这段时间里面,书面语法已经发展到省略做宾语的that不是错误的地步了?

那么在以后做题的时候,不把这个条件做为排除错误选项的原则应该就好了吧?

45#
发表于 2007-4-29 13:49:00 | 只看该作者

到底句子的结构是怎样的?

不明白2个THAT。。什么句?

46#
发表于 2007-4-30 14:26:00 | 只看该作者
这里如果用rather代替instead是没错的,但是这题为什么选a呢,其实就是因为并列的成分是 will avoid 和 (will) come,看其他选项,都是to come 等等的不定式或者介词结构,无法并列
47#
发表于 2007-5-1 14:54:00 | 只看该作者

我也对had feared earlier in the year的时态感到很困惑。谢谢牛牛的指教。我现在感觉,如果是early in the year,那么应该能用过去示,只是现在用了earlier比较级,会不会问题出在这里呢?

继续讨论中……

48#
发表于 2007-7-13 10:04:00 | 只看该作者

       OG里定语从句的that经常省略,而这里没有。原因可能是这个句子的修饰成份过长,为了避免歧义。正如og所说,the original sentence successfully avoids the problems that may occur in a long sentence with multiple modifiers.

           另外,og中说rather to come does not complete the second part of the sentence idiomatically,是说(will)come本来是应该与will avoid并列, 而to come不能完成这个功能。

           我觉得这里Instead不能与rather互换,og里只有instead of 才可与rather than 互换,并且能互换的答案都是有rather than那个。

49#
发表于 2007-8-25 17:39:00 | 只看该作者

本人拙见:confidence that..此处that 引导同位语从句对前面的抽象名词具体解释,而非定语从句。定语从句一般为修似成分,修饰一个名词或代词的从句称为定语从句,一般紧跟在它所修饰的先行词后面。此句具体化前面confidence的内容,而非修似限定什么样的confidence (e.g. strong or weak)。

语法书也介绍如何区别定语从句与同位语从句如下:

1.定语从句修饰先行词,它和先行词是修饰关系;同位语从句说明先行词的具体内容,是补充说明的关系

(1) The plane that has just taken off is for London.  定语从句

(2) The fact that he has been dead is clear.         同位于从句

2.定语从句由关系代词或者关系副词引导,关系词在句中充当成分,有时可以省略;同位语从句主要由that引导,在句中一般不做成分;句子也可以由when, where, how, why, whether, what等词引导,充当成分

(1) The news he told me is true.

(2) The news that he has just died is true.

(3) The problem that we are facing now is how we can collect so much money.  定语

(4) The problem how we can collect so much money is difficult to solve.

3. 同位语从句和先行词一般可以用be动词发展成一个完整的句子,而定语从句不可以

(1) The idea that we could ask the teacher for advice is wonderful.  同位语

(2) The idea was that we could ask the teacher for advice.

(3) The fact that the earth moves around the earth is known to all.

(4) The fact is that the earth moves around the earth.
50#
发表于 2007-8-29 15:45:00 | 只看该作者

结合og解释和讨论的,给出个人遇见。

A 从第一个that到最后,引导宾语从句修饰confidence;第二that引导定语从句修饰,修饰recession。这个that在定语从句中是做宾语成分,但连词在定语从句中做宾语是可以省略的,这里没有省略是大家争论的焦点。没有答案到现在为止。这是正确答案,大家应该没有异议吧。

B what取代了第二个that,肯定错。the economy to avoid the recession is wordy and awkful,应该没有问题,在gmat中,不一定是一定错,而是和其他选项的比较问题,和A比较,确实没有A那么清晰。那个rather没有讨论出结果来。

C earlier in the year修饰sth,在原句中却是做状语修饰feared,套用白永的一句,改变原句的重心了。instead问题没有答案。

D 问题就在省不省第二个that.没有答案,还需要多总结,这是疑点。我有好的总结会第一时间传上来。后面的rather主要是因为,逗号隔开的and 后面要接完整的主谓结构。

E时态问题到目前为止解释不是那么完美,但也可以接受。这里的担忧是指earlier this year那段时期之前到earlier this year,现在有gain了,大家恢复信心了,还要担忧吗?

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-24 19:13
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部