ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 5796|回复: 11
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD 21-5

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-10-29 00:33:00 | 只看该作者

GWD 21-5

GWD 21-5


There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.



A.       There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.


B.       There are no legal limits on the size of monkfish that can be caught, unlike cod or haddock, a circumstance that contributes to depleting them because they are being overfished.


C.       There are legal limits on the size of cod and haddock that can be caught, but not for monkfish, which contributes to its depletion through overfishing.


D.       Unlike cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish, which contributes to its depletion by being overfished.  (A)


E.        Unlike catching cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish, contributing to their depletion because they are overfished.


the answer is a, but I think it should be c.

沙发
发表于 2005-10-29 04:05:00 | 只看该作者

C有两个问题,第一是WHICH指代不清,按语法应是就近指代MONKFISH,这样语义就错误,第二点,A的原义是强调对MONKFISH的大小没有限制,但C中变为 肯定+BUT NOT的结构,是转折的平行结构,改变了A句强调的部分。


楼主请耐心做完OG的题,看完OG的解释,再做GWD,从你的提问来看,OG并没有掌握,建议最少看三遍以上~~

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-10-29 05:42:00 | 只看该作者

There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.


BUT WHAT DOES "THEIR" REFER TO? COD AND HADDOCK?  I think it should refer to monkfish, so the use of "their" is wrong, but should be replaced by its.


by the way, I have red the og for about 3 times, and I will take the test in no more than 10 days.


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-10-29 5:43:27编辑过]
地板
发表于 2005-10-30 19:45:00 | 只看该作者
MONKFISH 是不是单复数同型。
5#
发表于 2005-11-17 11:52:00 | 只看该作者

我认为是C,不同意版主的说法

6#
发表于 2005-11-17 15:07:00 | 只看该作者


A.       There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance(用新名词指代前面句子所带来的结果) that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.


C.       There are legal limits on the size of cod and haddock that can be caught, but not for monkfish, which(不能指代前面句子,而只能指代单个的词,所以错。且,but not for monkfish,可以被理解为插入语,从而造成which产生歧义 ) contributes to its depletion through overfishing.

7#
发表于 2006-1-21 22:33:00 | 只看该作者

支持A

8#
发表于 2006-6-22 14:29:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用yangxiaogang在2005-11-17 11:52:00的发言:

我认为是C,不同意版主的说法

C的which 只能修飾monkfish。邏輯意義不附。

9#
发表于 2006-6-22 15:09:00 | 只看该作者

A中their确实有问题,会不会monkfish单复数同型?

C肯定错,which没有指代对象。

10#
发表于 2006-6-23 14:02:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用hawkinsxie在2006-6-22 15:09:00的发言:

A中their确实有问题,会不会monkfish单复数同型?

C肯定错,which没有指代对象。

monkfish 单复数同型.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-2 19:54
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部