ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2618|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

og21

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-9-3 10:29:00 | 只看该作者

og21

21. Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their clients' misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested, but in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy, the perpetrators are in effect told that they are not responsible for their actions.
(A)    in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy
(B)    if criminal or delinquent behavior is attributed to an allergy to some food
(C)    in attributing behavior that is criminal or delinquent to an allergy to some food
(D)    if some food allergy is attributed as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior
(E)    in attributing a food allergy as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior
正确答案是b,请帮忙分析结构。谢谢!
沙发
发表于 2003-9-3 10:53:00 | 只看该作者
这题在考2点:
1、sth be attibuted to.
2、BUT引导完整主谓结构的句子,即使有省略也需要明确的逻辑主语,而A、C、E理论上的逻辑主语都是the perpetrators,明显不符合逻辑意思。而D中的sth is attributed as the cause of ....属于典型的 wordy 错误。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 01:22
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部