十一、同位结构&插入语&独立主格
1. 限定性作用的同位语起修饰作用, 同位语的使用可能会改变句子的语意重心OG18, 若把同位语盖住, 都没有说出”He’s wives were all strong” 的意思, 逻辑第一.
2. 判断同位语是否正确的依据是: 改成主系结构, 看通不通, Eg. As litigation grows more complex, the need that experts explain technical issues becomes more apparent.
(A) that experts explain technical issues becomes
(C) for experts to explain technical issues becomes
A用了同位语从句, The need is that experts explain technical issues, 不通, 所以错.
3. 同位结构(包括用破折号连接的), 也要注意谓语的单复搭配, OG18.
4. N1+N2+Verb 当N1是同位语时, N1后加逗号, N2不加后面逗号, OG56.
当N2是同位语时, N1后加逗号, N2后面加逗号, OG35, GWD6-41E.
5. 主谓之间的关系不能因为有插入语或者同位语而改变, ETS经常会以插入语或者同位语干扰主谓之间的逻辑, Eg. The painting, which sold for 20 million/ sold for 20 million, was the highest price. x 这里相当于说painting是highest price, 逻辑错误.
6. 同位结构应补出介词结构缺少的相应的概括性词语, 这样可以使逻辑清晰 (OG2, OG6), 否则由于同位结构不能指代前面的整个句子, 就会修饰前面的名词, 造成逻辑错误, eg. Since 1981, when the farm depression began, the number of acres overseen by professional farm-management companies has grown from 48 million to nearly 59 million, an area about the size of Colorado 如果不补出an area的话, about the size of Colorado就修饰the number of acres, 逻辑错误.
同位结构可以由重复性名词(OG189C, 大全651B), 解释性名词, 抽象名词(如information), 概括性名词(如findings), 代词(如one, OG9)或What 来引导.
进一步推广: 悬挂是同位结构在前面的句子是SVO结构的时候, 同位结构修饰前面的宾语, 如OG132题干中的about修饰前面的people, 如果想修饰的名词后面还有名词, 则必须补出以示清晰, OG208E; 如果结尾的宾语存在N1+介词+Noun2的, 同位结构两个都可以修饰, 因此必须补出以示清晰, 大全651B的wings的补出也是在避免修饰前面airplanes的歧义, GWD3-4B, 同时还要注意单复指代等问题, 如OG194D(判断A的错误要用到这点), 但是如果说N1或者N2之中出现了专有名词, 由于不会产生歧义, 可以不补出N1, 如OG263D; OG对于OG89DE的解释说明了在SVO结构中, 除非结尾的名词逻辑上面一定不可以被修饰, 也可以修饰句子主语, 但极为少见, 考试不用考虑.
7. 插入语前后一定要有逗号, OG149AE.
8. 主语和同位语尽量主谓一致, OG39; 实在不行再不去对应, 但是必须逻辑讲的通, OG213题干.
9. 同位语要和主语对应, 否则就会产生两个主语的情况了, 大全20A.
10. 同位语是起修饰作用, 一般用于修饰名词或名词短语, 对其修饰对象有解释力, OG220D: During a hundred years, a period beginning in 1788, 意思是a hundred years= a period beginning in 1788, 明显逻辑错误.
同理大全338, 如果同位语不具备解释力度, 就造成了动词前面两个意思没有联系的主语, 错误.
注意同位语不可以改做主语, OG56E, 这里存在一个逻辑错误, 可以说他是狗, 不可以说狗是他, 同理GWD6-41BE.
11. 独立主格:
a. 一般放在句首或句尾作状语, 表示伴随原因、条件、状态等:
一般独立主格(n.+n./-ed/-ing/介词短语/adj短语/名词)与主句形成松散的逻辑关系.
(OG104D, 不能用松散结构N+N, 无法体现关系)
with型独立主格(with n.+ -ed/-ing/adj/介词短语/名词/不定式)与主句形成紧密逻辑关系.
(OG104E, 很好的例子, 注意对比C)
each型独立主格(复数名词结尾, each+介词短语/adj短语/-ed/-ing)强调句尾名词.
b. 除with型独立主格外, 其它两个也可以作为同位结构放在句尾修饰前面的名词, 大全498E, OG122A.
12. WITH:
1. ,+with引导的独立主格结构, 在句末修饰前面的句子或动作 OG113D(E中的whose起不到伴随的作用, 所以错误), 注意这个with结构的主语不一定就是主句主语, 是要伴随的那个的主语; with的独立主格表示伴随, 在逻辑上面也许会关系错误, 小心.
2. with (without)引导的介词短语, 这时和其他介词短语一样, 在主谓宾句子中如果想作状语或修饰主语的定语, 就要把介词短语提至谓语动词之前以避免产生歧义; 但是即使是放在主谓宾后面(OG56)也可以, with优先伴随主语动作(这时with结构的主语是要伴随的那个动作的主语, 因此OG212E中的with会产生主语是主句主语的情况), 但是同时还是要看一下如果前面的N也有被修饰的可能的话(OG212, 这种policy是一个可以限定性修饰的词), 则歧义; 如果发现伴随不对(大全207, 很明显修饰house), 则也可以限定性修饰前面的名词; 如果是跟在修饰词的后面, 大全981, 则基本修饰前面的名词(lion), 如果逻辑上面是要伴随的, 则歧义; 体会OG50AD变化; ”, with”的在句尾的非限定性修饰结构, 比较容易有歧义.
3. with, that紧跟修饰语时表示限定性修饰, who表示非限定性修饰, 选择with的时候要慎重, OG141.
4. OG192D里面的with后面的成份有宾语, 因此整个with结构是副词, 不可以用来修饰前面的名词, 更确切的说是独立结构, 只能做状语, 同理OG102B, OG113DE对比可以发现, with可以相对避免定语从句修饰前面名词的歧义;
大全374: Eg. In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no contest to criminal charges of odometer tampering and agreed to pay more than $16 million in civil damages for cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected.
(A) cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected
(B) cars that it had test-driven with their disconnected odometers
(C) its cars having been test-driven with disconnected odometers
(D) having test-driven cars with their odometers disconnected (D)
(E) having cars that were test-driven with disconnected odometers
分析: 首先观察出AD中的with是独立主格做状语, 不可以修饰前面的cars, 而且that be是复杂表达; 再看D, 前面补出分词having, 刚好对应with, 而且意思正确, BCE中with前面是一个修饰成份, with优先修饰cars, 所以变成了修饰成份的并列, 简化的说就是为了车赔钱, 逻辑意思变化, 错; 但是注意OG104E, 这里用with的独立结构作为一个句子的状语, 符合逻辑意思, 不存在没有修饰对像的问题.
5. with做插入语可以表示伴随, 大全49A.
6. with引导介词短语放在句中也会产生夹心修饰的歧义, Eg. Unlike the short flights of the shuttle and earlier spacecraft, with sufficient enough power in fuel cells and batteries for their short flights, a permanently orbiting space station will have to generate its own electricity, 这个with在中间是不知道该修饰前面的还是后面的成份.
13. In good years, the patchwork of green fields that surround the laceName w:st="on">San JoaquinlaceName> laceType w:st="on">ValleylaceType> town bustles with farm workers, many of them in the area just for the season.
(A) surround the laceName w:st="on">San JoaquinlaceName> laceType w:st="on">ValleylaceType> town bustles with farm workers, many of them
(B) surrounds the laceName w:st="on">San JoaquinlaceName> Valley town bustles with farm workers, many of whom are
首先应该根据逻辑意思判断A of B哪个被定语从句修饰, 其次many of them是同位语, 比many of whom are简洁.
4. 同位语的引导用that, 不能用which, 出现混淆的, OG76CDE.
5. 在句中无论直接插入新名词还是以插入语的形式, 都有可能造成以前的代词指代不清晰, OG184D, OG227CE, 这题的they肯定不可以指代句子主语identities, OG的意思是此时就近指代, 所以中间出入新的名词是有歧义的.
16. Unlike/ like在句中作为插入语, 小心夹心修饰, Eg. Because young children do not organize their attention or perceptions systematically, like adults, they may notice and remember details that their elders ignore.
(A) like adults
(D) as adults do
4. 插入语可以修饰前面的名词, OG147CE; 也可以修饰主语中心语(当在谓语前面的时候), 大全733B; 当like结构放在句尾的时候不再是插入语, 而是主语插入语的后置, 还是修饰主语, like结构修饰只要不产生歧义, 可以跳越, 选择最好的, OG189C; 注意OG147, 这里插入语没有造成夹心修饰, 因为后面不存在另一个比较对像.
18. OG222对于E的解释相当不负责任,这里E是一个同位语从句应该是没有争议的,问题就在这里,同位语从句是表示一种和前面的先行词等同的意思,比如:the fact that the money has gone does not mean it was stolen,这里的fact和 the money has gone是完全意义上的等同;可是本题中that they can withhold public disclosure of the identities of its sources of intelligence information和其先行词power明显不具有语意等同的特点, 故E错
19. 不是所有的名词都可以接同位语从句, OG63E的danger接同位语从句是不符合规范的, ETS几乎没有这样的同位结构出现, 都是定从, 同位语从句多在解释原理时应用.
20. 破折号引出的同位结构如果作为修饰名词性质的, 同样也可以跳越(在无歧义情况下), 大全859说明在A of B结构中可以跳越, GWD6-27E说明可以补出一个概括性名词以清晰指代, GWD9-1说明了连后置的分词都可以跳过去, 说明在结尾出现复杂的名词结构的时候, 优先修饰中心词. |