关于comma+ving的总结 来自ron视频观看笔记总结

ZOObiubiu

总结comma+VING的用法：
   用来修饰名词：
       1.可以用来修饰touching noun，在comma+VING之前的名词
          但这种修饰情况，在comma+VING之前的必须是名词，不能是句子；
       2.用来修饰句子中的主语
          但这种修饰情况，该句子中的主语必须是这个VING的动作中的source/agent/do-er
  用来修饰句子：
      3. 用来修饰前一句句子
           这种情况下，VING应该是前一句句子导致的结果或使用的方式或者是更进一步的描述，也就是作结果状语或者伴随状语

以上是我的总结 来自不同的视频笔记 欢迎讨论
以下是ron两节课讲的原话，发上来供大家参考
一、
comma+ving
It should describe the whole idea of preceding clause in some way :
Immediate result ;   ways  in which the preceding statement works or is true ;  more specific description of the preceding  statement.
二、
[img]blob:https://forum.chasedream.com/6d64ca86-e5a3-438d-99f5-cecfdb6d7a90[/img]

ZOObiubiu

图没了就直接打字吧第二节课ron原话：
The subject of previous clause should be the source /agent /do-er of the action described in the -ING.
Eg: Matt’s sister slapped him ,angering the child’s father.
——-dad was mad at Matt ‘s sister for hitting him.
Matt was slapped by his sister, angering the child’s father.
——— dad was mad at Matt.


Can the comma +VING modifiers ever modify the touching noun?
If the modifier comes after a clause, then no.
If it just follows a noun(not a clause ), then ,yes , it can.
这段话是学生问ron， ron回答的。

gototomorrow

很棒，总结的很好了~~谢谢楼主

dfg090

感谢！
能告知一下是Ron哪节课说的吗？

ZOObiubiu

dfg090 发表于 2019-7-27 17:13
感谢！
能告知一下是Ron哪节课说的吗？

抱歉，没记是哪节课

chiwawa123

楼主是不是已经考过了？

ZOObiubiu

chiwawa123 发表于 2020-1-8 13:39
楼主是不是已经考过了？

嗯 sc rank>90% 以上经验证是没有问题的

王壮实

ZOObiubiu 发表于 2020-1-9 14:05
嗯 sc rank>90% 以上经验证是没有问题的

想问一下SVO，which.... , ving.....这里ving的逻辑主语是s还是which从句中的s

蟹黄味蚕豆

好帖

qye6

ZOObiubiu 发表于 2019-7-26 19:28
图没了就直接打字吧第二节课ron原话：
The subject of previous clause should be the source /agent /do-e ...

Tyler was slapped by a girl at recess, infuriating his father.
--> tyler's dad was mad at his son for letting a girl slap him. he wasn't necessarily mad at the girl.

A girl slapped Tyler at recess, infuriating his father.
--> tyler's dad was mad at the girl for slapping his son. he wasn't necessarily mad at his son.