ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1573|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[SC悬赏令] 这道语法题答案求解

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2019-7-9 08:51:42 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
1. Temporary-employment agencies benefit not only from the increasing demand for clerical workers but also the higher profits made when highly paid professionals are placed, requests for whom have increased in the recent wave of corporate takeovers.             157 26

(A) the higher profits made when highly paid professionals are placed, requests for whom
(B) the higher profitsthat are made in the placement of highly paid professionals, requests for whom
(C) from the requests for highly paid professionals, who make higher profits for the agencies when placed and whose requests
(D) from highly paid professionals, whose placement makes higher profits for the agencies and whose requests.
(E) from the higher profits made in placing highly paid professionals, requests for whom



答案是E,我的问题是E选项逗号之后跟个完整句子“requests for whom have increased”,这样应该是不对的啊
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2019-7-9 09:27:51 | 只看该作者
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2019-7-9 14:53:47 | 只看该作者
Hanfetz 发表于 2019-7-9 09:27
https://forum.chasedream.com/forum.php?mobile=1&mod=viewthread&tid=455382

谢谢,这贴我看过,我不懂的是 逗号连接了两个句子,T-E benefit ...,request have...,第二个句子怎么理解是同位语的?
地板
发表于 2019-7-11 09:45:54 | 只看该作者
Dreamdrives 发表于 2019-7-9 14:53
谢谢,这贴我看过,我不懂的是 逗号连接了两个句子,T-E benefit ...,request have...,第二个句子怎么 ...

看语义,不要抠语法规则
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2019-7-11 10:58:51 | 只看该作者
HoganTong 发表于 2019-7-11 09:45
看语义,不要抠语法规则

谢谢,我知道语义很重要,但是没有连词就这样出现两个句子难道不是绝对错误的规则嘛?
6#
发表于 2019-7-11 12:34:48 | 只看该作者
Dreamdrives 发表于 2019-7-11 10:58
谢谢,我知道语义很重要,但是没有连词就这样出现两个句子难道不是绝对错误的规则嘛? ...

个人认为requests for whom的句子是modifier,whom修饰前述的highly paid professionals
所以不是一个独立句子,是一个从句。
7#
发表于 2019-7-14 18:52:01 来自手机 | 只看该作者
个人认为request后面是个同位语,是对replaceing highly paid...的再次叙述
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-9 11:21
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部