ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1378|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[SC悬赏令] 有点矛盾的一个点,求解答

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2019-5-6 03:12:08 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
有一个知识点是  to是用来修饰主语的,
这个知识点记得比较牢因为有一道题做错了

Hydrocarbons, with which fruit flies perfume themselves in species-specific blends, are known to be important in courtship, and apparently this assists flies that taste the hydrocarbons on prospective mates to distinguish their own species from that of others.

D apparently assisting flies to taste the hydrocarbons on prospective mates to distinguish their own species from those of
E apparently assisting flies that taste the hydrocarbons on prospective mates in distinguishing their own species from
选E不选D是因为D用了to,Hydrocarbons是不能去taste一个东西的



但是在这道题里
Nineteenth-century doctors thought that alcohol, when ingested, passed through the stomach into the bloodstream and was broken down only by the liver; recent studies, however, have led them to conclude that the stomach breaks down up to 20 percent of ingested alcohol before it reaches the liver.

C have led doctors to conclude
E lead to the doctors` conclusion

答案是C
因为to是修饰主语的,所以这里的to conclude是去修饰recent studies,
但是recent studies能去conclude一个结论吗,不应该是doctors去conclude一个结论吗?
所以我就选了个比较丑的E

求解答
感觉有一些矛盾,不知道怎么说服自己



收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2019-5-6 04:00:21 | 只看该作者
因为主语能不能发出to这个动作错了好几次,有点神经质,看到to就要去对应能不能被主语发出,结果就错了
下个礼拜考试,不搞懂这个点有点慌张啊
板凳
发表于 2019-5-13 18:11:27 来自手机 | 只看该作者
你其实是没有理解句子的意思当然for doing 和to do优选  to do
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-4-27 00:21
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部