ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
本题详情

本贴相关题目 OG (SADG)

00:00:00

In his research paper, Dr. Frosh, medical director of the Payne Whitney Clinic, distinguishes mood swings, which may be violent without their being grounded in mental disease, from genuine manic-depressive psychosis.

正确答案: C

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 4241|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG SC 15

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-9-1 11:18:00 | 只看该作者

OG SC 15

15. In his research paper, Dr. Frosh, medical director of the Payne Whitney Clinic, distinguishes mood swings. which may be violent without their being grounded in mental disease, from genuine manic-depressive psychosis.

(A)    mood swings, which may be violent without their being grounded in mental disease, from genuine manic-depressive psychosis
(B)    mood swings, perhaps violent without being grounded in mental disease, and genuine manic-depressive psychosis ,
(C)    between mood swings, which may be violent without being grounded in mental disease, and genuine manic-depressive psychosis
(D)    between mood swings, perhaps violent without being grounded in mental disease, from genuine manic-depressive psychosis
(E)    genuine manic-depressive psychosis and mood swings, which may be violent without being grounded in mental disease

ETS Exaplaination
The best choice is C because it uses the idiomatically correct expression distinguishes between x and y and because it provides a structure in which the relative clause beginning which may be violent clearly modifies mood swings. The other choices use distinguishes in unidiomatic constructions. Additionally, their in A is intrusive and unnecessary, and the modifier of mood swings in B and D (perhaps violent) is awkward and less clear than the more developed clause which may be violent.

My Question:
Why is the modifier of mood swings in B and D (perhaps violent) awkward and less clear? thanks!







[此贴子已经被作者于2003-9-1 11:19:02编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2003-9-1 11:27:00 | 只看该作者
我也不太明白,只是隐约觉得perhaps和maybe过于主观,慎用,应替换成probably(是不是,忘了?)或may be
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2003-9-1 11:32:00 | 只看该作者
高!这是从哪儿看来的?
according to OG SC 26, "probably">"maybe". Is it the same reason behind?

以下是引用anchoret在2003-9-1 11:27:00的发言:
我也不太明白,只是隐约觉得perhaps和maybe过于主观,慎用,应替换成probably(是不是,忘了?)或may be



[此贴子已经被作者于2003-9-1 11:38:19编辑过]
地板
发表于 2003-9-1 11:45:00 | 只看该作者
类似的还有hopefully,应该替换成it is hoped等。

文词替换的还有:old--ancient
death--obtuary

还有一些,但是忘了
5#
发表于 2003-9-1 11:50:00 | 只看该作者
语法讨论还是请到语法区,否则数学讨论会被淹没的 :)

我等会帮你移过去
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2003-9-1 12:00:00 | 只看该作者
哦,对不起忘了.只是觉得这儿人多势众,高手也多.

被很多问题困扰了很久,到了不处理不行的地步了

以下是引用anchoret在2003-9-1 11:50:00的发言:
语法讨论还是请到语法区,否则数学讨论会被淹没的 :)

我等会帮你移过去
7#
发表于 2003-9-2 06:53:00 | 只看该作者
非限制性定语从句不能省which.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-15 08:21
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部