AI092,恳请大家指教！

bunny_piggy · 发表于 2005-9-22 18:17:00

恳请大家多多指教！~

AI092

"Government should establish regulations to reduce or eliminate any suspected health hazards in the environment, even when the scientific studies of these health hazards are incomplete or contradictory."

Whether should a government establish regulations to decrease or clear up any suspected health hazards in the environment is a controversial issue among different people. The speaker argues that a government certainly should do so, even when the scientific studies of such health hazards are incomplete or contradictory. In general, my opinion is that a government should play an important and essential role in protecting human beings from harms that threaten their health. Some reasons support my views are addressed as followed:

In the first place, a government should maintain an excellent environment for human beings to live happily and healthily, and hence it ought to make great efforts to diminish or eliminate any health hazards in the environment by establishing relative regulations. For example, as far as I know, the problem of ozone depletion is result from the CFC emissions, and governments established laws and regional regulations in order to forbid the production of the CFC not only because the depletion of ozone gives rise of the deteriorated climate condition, but also because such problem makes a great many of people suffer bitter pain of serious dermatosis. Thereby governments should do their best to protect people from healthy hazards and create a better living environment.

In the second place, the regulative programs or laws that a government carries out should base on the tested theories and scientific studies. That is to say, before a government implements any laws or regulations, which are aim to reduce or dispel health dangers in the environment, the government would better to substantiate that such dangers really jeopardize human beings into significant risks by scientific studies and tested theories. Moreover, laws and regulations are sacred and formal rules in the society, and hence, the false information in such documents or wrong decision may imply that the government is a little foolish and often break its words. That is a terrible thing, I think.

In addition, with the development of science and technology, human beings may understand the world better and better, so they can rapidly and exactly judge whether one thing is harmful to people's health.

In sum, given the reasons discussed above, which probably interwind to form an organic whole and thus become more persuasive and compelling, we can safely arrive at the conclusion that governments should play an substantial role in safeguarding people's health and happy life, and try their best to decrease and banish health jeopardy in the environment by establishing efficient regulations in the basis of tested theories and scientific studies.