求助一道完全看不懂题目的题！

889453

Benford’s Law, stating that, in real-world sets of numbers, certain digits appear more often as leading digits than do others, is so counterintuitive that when it is used as evidence in trials where financial fraud is concerned, the evidence often considered a desperate ploy by the prosecution, even if the numbers strongly point to malfeasance.

A.when it is used as evidence in trials where financial fraud is concerned, the evidence often considered a desperate ploy by the prosecution, even if
B.if it is used as evidence in trials in which financial fraud is concerned, and that it is often considered to be a desperate ploy by the prosecution, even when
C.when it is used as evidence in trials in which financial fraud is concerned—often considered a desperate ploy on the prosecution’s part, even if
D.when the prosecution, in what is often considered a desperate ploy, uses it as evidence in trials in which financial fraud is concerned, even when
E.when used as evidence in trials concerning financial fraud, such evidence is often considered a desperate ploy on the part of the prosecution, even should

来源：magoosh  OA：E

我看了半天就看懂了前半句，XXX, 【stating that,（ in real-world sets of numbers）, certain digits appear….,】 is so…的结构，后半句的evidence是指把这部法律作为证据吗？最后半句的even should the numbers strongly point to the malfeasance完全没看懂

有没有大神解答一下？

kluivert

这哪里看到的题目啊，和官方的不一样...改了不少词组

A.when it is used as evidence in trials where financial fraud is concerned, the evidence often considered a desperate ploy by the prosecution, even if
B.if it is used as evidence in trials in which financial fraud is concerned, and that it is often considered to be a desperate ploy by the prosecution, even when
C.when it is used as evidence in trials in which financial fraud is concerned—often considered a desperate ploy on the prosecution’s part, even if  Ved修饰不清
D.when the prosecution, in what is often considered a desperate ploy, uses it as evidence in trials in which financial fraud is concerned, even when
E.when used as evidence in trials concerning financial fraud, such evidence is often considered a desperate ploy on the part of the prosecution, even should

even should和 even if个人觉得没啥区别 ,even when和even if 官方的解释是这里差别甚微，都可以用

if you have any questions ,please feel free to ask me
should you have any questions ,please feel free to ask me

只要排除点：
1. consider + Noun
2. where --> in which
3. the evidence often considered a desperate ploy


Benford’s Law应该是定律..in real-world sets of numbers, certain digits appear more often as leading digits than do others

正规官方题目 （MAGOOSH）：

Benford’s Law, stating that certain numbers appear more often in nature than do others, is so counterintuitive that [size=13.3333px]when used as evidence in trials where financial fraud is concerned, it is often construed as a desperate ploy on the part of the prosecution, even if the numbers strongly point to malfeasance.

A) when used as evidence in trials where financial fraud is concerned, it is often construed as a desperate ploy on the part of the prosecution, even if
B) if used as evidence in trials in which financial fraud is concerned, it is often construed to be a desperate ploy by the prosecution, even when
C) when used as evidence in financial fraud trials, it is often construed to be a desperate ploy on the prosecution’s part, even if
D) if used as evidence in trials in which financial fraud is concerned, the evidence is often construed by the prosecution as a desperate ploy, even when
E) when used as evidence in trials concerning financial fraud, such evidence is often construed as a desperate ploy used by the prosecution, even when