ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3663|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Modifier时态问题,求解答

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2018-9-23 20:11:36 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
In the seventh century B.C., the Roman alphabet was adapted from the Etruscan alphabet, which in turn had been adapted in the previous century from a western Greek alphabet, which itself had been adapted earlier in the same century from the Phoenician alphabet.

  • A
    which itself had been adapted earlier
  • B
    adapting itself earlier
  • C
    itself being adapted earlier
  • D
    having been earlier adapted itself
  • E
    earlier itself having been adapted


OG解释里说C项中的being是现在时
The present tense of the reflexive participialphrase is inappropriate for describing anevent prior to the seventh century BC


但我前几天看ron的视频里说到:
modifier adopt the timeframe of the clause to which they are attached!
三个正确例子:
Students writing paper 150 years ago used
Students writing paper in today’s school use
Students writing paper twenty years in the future will

所以,类似这题C选项的独立主格结构中 “bing” 的时态怎么确定?难道是因为modifier “itself”而“itself”只是个noun,所以就是现在时?



                                                
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2018-9-23 21:06:32 | 只看该作者
有人吗
板凳
发表于 2018-9-24 04:29:44 | 只看该作者
答案是啥
地板
发表于 2018-9-24 09:16:22 | 只看该作者
帮你粘贴个解释

he key to solve is understanding "the sequence of events" and "the verb tenses"

In the seventh century B.C., the Roman alphabet was adapted from the Etruscan alphabet, [event 1]
which in turn had been adapted in the previous century from a western Greek alphabet, [event 2]
which itself had been adapted earlier in the same century from the Phoenician alphabet. [event 3]

From the meaning we can understand that
Sequence: "event 1" happened after "event 2" happened after "event 3"
Tenses: "was" > "had been" > "had been"
Tenses: "past" > "past perfect" > "past perfect"

Since "had been (past perfect)" is used (non-underlined) for event 2, we should use "had been (past perfect)" for event 3.
(though usage of "had been" for event 2 and event 3 are not necessary as the timelines [centuries before/after] are clearly provided)

A. which itself had been adapted earlier
- maintains the correct tense for the correct sequence
B. adapting itself earlier
- "adapting" makes event 3 as modifier to event 2
C. itself being adapted earlier
- missing correct clause connector (which/that/whose/etc). "being adapted" is past tense, we should use only past perfect tense
D. having been earlier adapted itself
- "having" makes event 3 as modifier to event 2
E. earlier itself having been adapted
- missing correct clause connector (which/that/whose/etc). "having been adapted" is past tense, we should use only past perfect tense
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2018-9-27 15:55:11 | 只看该作者

答案是A
6#
发表于 2018-9-27 16:17:04 | 只看该作者
逗号加V-ing要么修饰主语,要么修饰前面的句子,不可以修饰宾语,排除BD, CE都不完整都是itself in the same century  ,只有A合适
7#
发表于 2018-9-28 12:01:58 | 只看该作者
你好楼主,谢谢分享

你的疑问是不是 modifier adopt the timeframe of the clause to which they are attached!


这个Ron说的跟GMAC的解释不矛盾。

首先:
modifier adopt the timeframe of the clause to which they are attached!
三个正确例子:
Students writing paper 150 years ago used…
Students writing paper in today’s school use…
Students writing paper twenty years in the future will

这里的意思是writing paper XX 这个modifier的时态,是跟clause的timeframe是一致的。

而题目中要求的Timeframe是跟前面from a western Greek alphabet的不一致的。

是句子意思要求两句话的timeframe不一致,并不是有语法错误。

C选项除了意思不符之外,itself 前面还应该加which that等,才能修饰Greek alphabet
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2018-9-30 13:21:14 | 只看该作者
Lanchenia 发表于 2018-9-28 12:01
你好楼主,谢谢分享

你的疑问是不是 modifier adopt the timeframe of the clause to which they are atta ...

谢谢回复
itself being adapted earlier 是独立主格结构吧...我有点把独立主格和同位语搞混了,还以为可以就近修饰呢
9#
发表于 2021-9-2 16:25:34 | 只看该作者
看一下!               
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-20 18:21
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部