ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 6591|回复: 20
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[SC 700-800]各位大佬走过路过进来看看!令我费解的一句话!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2018-9-18 23:44:02 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
The domestic cat descended from the African wildcat approximately 4,000 years ago, an exceedingly recent divergence with respect to genetic evolution and one which scarcely seems
sufficient to allow the marked physical changes in the animal.

求大佬先分析一下句子结构
comma后,是同位语吗? 如果是,这个句子怎么翻译

最后附上原题
22. Descending approximately 4,000 years ago from the African wildcat, it has been an
exceedingly short time for the domestic cat with respect to genetic evolution and it scarcely
seems sufficient to allow the marked physical changes that transformed the animal.

• Descending approximately 4,000 years ago from the African wildcat, it has been an
exceedingly short time for the domestic cat with respect to genetic evolution and it scarcely
seems sufficient to allow the marked physical changes that transformed the animal.
• The domestic cat descended from the African wildcat approximately 4,000 years ago, which is
an exceedingly short time for the domestic cat's genetic evolution and scarcely sufficient for
the marked physical changes that transformed the animal.
• Descending from the African wildcat approximately 4,000 years ago, the domestic cat has had
an exceedingly short time for its genetic evolution and has been scarcely sufficient for the
marked physical changes in the animal.
• Having descended from the African wildcat approximately 4,000 years ago, the domestic cat
has had an exceedingly short time for its genetic evolution that has scarcely been sufficient for
the marked physical changes that transformed the animal.
• The domestic cat descended from the African wildcat approximately 4,000 years ago, an
exceedingly recent divergence with respect to genetic evolution and one which scarcely seems
sufficient to allow the marked physical changes in the animal.


收藏收藏1 收藏收藏1
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2018-9-19 16:15:20 | 只看该作者
还有这个正确句 也是700-800里的
As in 2004, first-time buyers bought cars as often as, if not more often than, return customers, buoying......
这里SVO完整的情况下,buyers bought cars as often as return customers (did)
did是不是不应该省略? 个人认为省略了有歧义,求大神解释一下
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2018-9-19 20:04:21 | 只看该作者
Although Moliere's satirical play Tartuffe was condemned by his contemporaries, he is now
considered the writer of one of the most famous French plays of all time.
• was condemned by his contemporaries, he is now considered the writer of
• was condemned by his contemporaries, it is now considered
• resulted in condemnation by contemporaries, he is now considered to be the writer of
• resulted in condemnation of him by contemporaries, it is now considered to be
• condemned him by his contemporaries, it is now considered

答案是B,可是这后面的意思应该是M这个人被看作是writer吧,怎么也不可能用it去指代play,play被看作是writer吧?
虽然另外四项都错 he不可以去指代所有格里的名词
但是我个人觉得正确答案也有问题?从语义上讲?
地板
发表于 2018-9-22 16:23:35 | 只看该作者
顶楼主!今天做到楼主po的第一题 错选了B。
B可能确实是不太好4000 years ago是一个时间点,不能用short time来进行修饰。
E中的an exceedingly recent divergence修饰前面整个句子:家猫是非洲野猫4000年前进化而来的,这是在遗传进化方面的变化。
但是我还是不太理解and后面的one which指代的是前面的哪一部分内容呢?求大神解答
5#
发表于 2018-9-22 17:06:09 | 只看该作者
我也今天做到这道题,同样费解。
这里one只能指代divergence了,当时错选D也是觉得/scarcely seems sufficient.../这句话不好找到先行词,但E中这个divergence很好概括了这句话,意思是这个(基因上的)差异还不足以在猫的生理上产生明显的变化
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2018-9-22 21:21:02 | 只看该作者
槛外人 发表于 2018-9-22 16:23
顶楼主!今天做到楼主po的第一题 错选了B。
B可能确实是不太好4000 years ago是一个时间点,不能用short ti ...

终于有人回复了,感谢哈哈哈,以为自己在自己帖子里单机玩来着。
comma后的内容我是真的不懂 头都大了
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2018-9-22 21:23:25 | 只看该作者
irissunflower 发表于 2018-9-22 17:06
我也今天做到这道题,同样费解。
这里one只能指代divergence了,当时错选D也是觉得/scarcely seems suffici ...

那是这句话结构是不是"SVO, an divergence and one(divergence) which" ,divergence做抽象类概括同位语,后面的one也是同位语? 也就是 “同位语”and“同位语”
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2018-9-22 21:31:12 | 只看该作者
irissunflower 发表于 2018-9-22 17:06
我也今天做到这道题,同样费解。
这里one只能指代divergence了,当时错选D也是觉得/scarcely seems suffici ...

我再仔细看了一下,我是觉得one有点指代evolution的感觉,进化的时间太短以至于没法physical change,你觉得呢?
9#
发表于 2018-9-22 21:55:42 | 只看该作者
jaydenpasson 发表于 2018-9-22 21:31
我再仔细看了一下,我是觉得one有点指代evolution的感觉,进化的时间太短以至于没法physical change,你 ...

我比较同意5楼的观点
因为我觉得one指代evolution的话,语义上说不清楚,而且D中的that就是指代的evolution,解析说是错的
而且我觉得one which前面还有一个and , 感觉这样就更不可能指代evolution了
个人拙见~这个句子我现在度还是觉得很迷……唉
10#
发表于 2018-9-23 10:51:40 | 只看该作者
jaydenpasson 发表于 2018-9-22 21:23
那是这句话结构是不是"SVO, an divergence and one(divergence) which" ,divergence做抽象类概括同位语 ...

应该不是evolution哦,因为原句/genetic evolution and one which scarcely seems/, 如果one是evolution那么这句话应该是/genetic evolution which scarcely seems/。
做到这道题也只能记住答案,也算是多了解一种同位语的用法了、
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-9 06:22
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部