请问OG SC 261

清风剑

以下是引用jnlvo在2004-4-4 17:47:00的发言：

其实看懂了下面这段og的解释，就能回答楼主的问题。

Also, these forms do not establish a logical time sequence, suggesting, for example, that Mukherjee had been a United States citizen before she lived in England and Canada and first came to the United States.

OG此解释令人费解,有明显的时间标志，怎么可以理解成这样？

horsefish

(A)  Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee has

OG解释:In A, the phrase Being... and born violates parallelism and oddly presents its information in reverse chronological order

我的问题: 过去分词和现在分词不能并列?还是仅仅因为时间顺序问题不能并列?

horsefish

以下是引用pumpkin在2004-8-13 4:20:00的发言：
： 可以并列的。 有个补充OG的解释中有个题目是钟表产生的意思有， OG中有个说fungus的， 都是这种。

我记得时可以的, 那么就是时间逻辑所以不能并列了

irene2023

以下是引用horsefish在2004-8-13 4:15:00的发言：

(A)  Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee has

OG解释:In A, the phrase Being... and born violates parallelism and oddly presents its information in reverse chronological order

我的问题: 过去分词和现在分词不能并列?还是仅仅因为时间顺序问题不能并列?

但我对OG的理解是这样的：A犯了两个错误，一是违反平衡，二是时间序列颠倒，若过去分词和现在分词可并列，那么此处到底是违反了什么平衡呢？是was born与has been不能并列吗？

jimjohn

Have you been Egld?

dormousedzc

晕了,XDF说现在时态和过去时态不能在同一句话中.

这里就出现了现在完成时和过去时的联用,而且从所谓的时间顺序来看还是现在完成时在前,过去时在后

我彻底无语了...

easy4meeeeee

用XDF规则做题，80％的题都差不多能做对

这句LS应该也听过吧

还有漏网之鱼呢

ppjelly

看了所有的讨论贴，对此题还是不清楚啊不清楚。说说我的理解，还请NN指正。万分感谢！！：）

261.Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in Calcutta
in 1940. author Bharati Mukherjee has lived in England and Canada,
and first came to the United States in 1961 to study at the Iowa
Writers' Workshop.
(A) Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee has--错在有since，所以前面应该用having been。
(B) Having been a United States citizen since 1988, she was born in Calcutta in 1940; author Bharati Mukherjee--不知道哪里错了？？只是觉得she放在前面看着不顺眼，但是我记得代词里面好像有说可以这样，前面用代词，后面再用具体名词。
(C) Born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee became a United States citizen in 1988; she has
(D) Being born in Calcutta in 1940 and having been a United States citizen since 1988, author Bharati Mukherjee --错在born这种一次性事件，能用being么？
(E) Having been born in Calcutta in 1940 and being a United States citizen since 1988, author Bharati Mukherjee--born的错误同D,另since前要用完成时






    

lulu_odin

newjoshkao

想了半天，終於領悟到，the author可能是位空中飛人，為了取得美國公民的身分而在US和England, Canada之間來回奔波。

也就是，她1940在印度出生之後，不知何時起開始在England和Canada之間蹍轉居住(印度很多有錢人的小孩從小就被送去英國(前殖民者)唸書的,合理推測她應該在1961年,也就是21歲大學畢業之前,就已經到英國去居住了, 所以這段話擺在first came to the US之前，到目前為止還是維持有在這兩地居住一定時間的習慣，只不過她在1961那年到了美國去讀書，並且在1988年取得美國公民的身分。(咱們很多希望取得美國公民身分、又不希望放棄原有國籍的有錢同胞，也是每三個月或半年飛一次,兩地跑)