gwd28-24

heshaohua666

Until the passage of the Piracy and Counterfeiting Amendments Act in 1982, a first-time charge of copyright infringement was merely a misdemeanor charge, federal prosecutors being unlikely in pursuing criminal copyright infringers, while offenders were subject to relatively small penalties.

 

1. charge, federal prosecutors being unlikely in pursuing criminal copyright infringers, while offenders were

2. charge, with federal prosecutors who were unlikely to pursue criminal copyright infringers, offenders being

3. charge, federal prosecutors unlikely to pursue criminal copyright infringers, while offenders were[h1] 

4. charge; therefore, federal prosecutors were unlikely in pursuing criminal copyright infringers and offenders being

5. charge; therefore, federal prosecutors were unlikely to pursue criminal copyright infringers, and offenders were[h2] 

---

 [h1]独立主格做状语，修饰主句，行不通。

 [h2]Ok.

第一次指控以轻罪告终，导致后面一直都是原告不究，被告轻判。逻辑与普通法有关，判例法。

xiangqinzh

therefore 是副词,不能做连词用,在之前需要一个分号把2个句子分开.

colorful_na

UP

wsdoll

up

michaelshl

ai...楼上蜘蛛侠nn。。。就是读不懂啊

lichabrend

up

aegean040

怎么就不能理解为伴随结构呢？做主句的解释啊，我认为C的逻辑没有错。是不是做伴随结构中不能用从句？while...错了？

AlienX

如果是隨伴, 該用..., verb-ing...

duducrystal

还是米搞懂也。。哪位NN来个明确的说法。。

忽闪闪院长

我本来选的是C。但是后来想了想，如果把federal prosecutors unlikely to pursue criminal copyright infringers理解成独立主格结构的话，那么while与它平行也必须是个独立主格结构，可是while后面明显是连接了一个句子……所以排除C……不知这样的解释对否？