- UID
- 988424
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2014-3-12
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
mfin的课程还蛮数理的...只能呵呵了.
如果你本身是business background, 那的確是挺quantitative的.
但如果你是理工背景的, 那就只能說, you have a lot to learn in financial engineering.
details:
1/3 Fundamental Core, 1/3 Advanced Core, 1/3 Stream Core
頭三分一是general finance, 是CFA stuffs 和FE/ quant fina無關, 與quantitative拉不關係, 略.
中間三分一是講derivatives, 但是at least 2.5 out of 4 of them are too easy, derivatives 用john hull, programming is still excel VBA spreadsheet, math的頭半部份也是太淺when compared to other master.
只有第三部份才真的是碩士而不是本科水平. program structure 上看就好像很多elective, 但是估計因為資源&賺錢原因, 不少advanced elective (e.g. adv math fina, adv IR model)似乎是多年沒有開班的.....先不說為甚麼他們好像總是喜歡讓research interest 不對口的prof來授課了....
當然, 這個是按金工的角度去看的. 但如果不是從這個角度看的話, 又何必上FE stream, 何必理quantitative與否呢?
To OP:
去HKU FBE任一課程都是買名氣, 而不要祈求從課程學到甚麼太多的.
建議MEcon, 兩者的difference不值這個錢 (原價都不值, 先不說還有留位費.)
同時建議this summer / Nov CFA 1.
MEcon core不要選難的theoy, 混UG level的analysis就行. 反正又不是讀PhD. 留下時間努力找工作就是.
如果是想做financial analysis的, 建議盡快考CFA 1, 2. 據說CPA(回國)也有用.
Risk的話, 建議MEcon 選data analysis stram, + FRM, 再audit/take a couple of stat course (stat in econ are too easy), and also audit/select a couple of finace course (you need to know how they are used)
Fina Engineering (other than risk)的話, 建議重新申請.
|
|