【求大神】OG15114

Dreamout

40、（OG15114）Starfish, with anywhere from five to eight arms, have a strongregenerative ability, and if one arm is lost it quickly replaces it, sometimesby the animal overcompensating and growing an extra one or two.

A one arm is lost it quickly replaces it,sometimes by the animal overcompensating and

B one arm is lost it is quickly replaced, with the animalsometimes overcompensating and

C they lose one arm they quickly replace it,sometimes by the animal overcompensating,

D they lose one arm they are quicklyreplaced, with the animal sometimes overcompensating,

E they lose one arm it is quickly replaced, sometimes with theanimal overcompensating,

Agreement；Idiom

In a conditional sentence if X, (then) Y, rhetorical flow isenhanced by the two clauses sharing the same structure. If one clause ispassive, the other should be passive; if one clause is active, the other shouldbe active, too.

B. The conditional structure is clear andcorrect.

C. This answer choice allows the unintended reading that the animal replaces the missing arm by overcompensating.The logical connection between overcompensatingand growing is unclear.

E The conditional clause has an active verb, whilethe result clause has a passive verb. The logical connection betweenovercompensating and growing is unclear.

语义不合。这里的by指的是借助某种力量来达成某种目的，而本句话的overcompensating应该是unintended的。

1by 1    n.
2 a : through or through the medium of : VIA<enter by the door> b : in the direction of : TOWARD<north by east> c : into the vicinity of and beyond :PAST<went right by him>

求问大神E选项！！！！OG上解释说 The conditional clause has an active verb, while the result clause has a passive verb，想问so what?条件状语从句和结果从句还不能用不同的语态？被动和主动也要平行？

sheanen

排版亂了

條件句前後時態不一定相同 EX If S+V, S will+V or If S had Vpp, S+ would have Vpp
但像OG所說的 前後主被動要一致

Dreamout

sheanen 发表于 2017-3-14 10:37
排版亂了

條件句前後時態不一定相同 EX If S+V, S will+V or If S had Vpp, S+ would have Vpp

Mark一下！               

changfengpx

E选项不是像og解释那样错误，最明显的错误如下：
而是错在they 跟 the animal指代不一致（英文叫do not argee，不知道是不是中文这个意思）。
Starfish,...,have...这里用了have,说明 starfish是复数，只不过长得像单数的样子,可以用they指代。if they lose one arm it is quickly replaced, sometimes with the animal....
然而they（复数）...with the animal(单数)...这里with作为伴随状语是用来修饰they的，这个句子存在很明显的指代的单复数不一致。

正确选项B选项不存在这个问题：
if one arm is lost it is quickly replaced, with the animal... 这里都是单数，结合上下文就可以理解的很清楚句子的意思了。

Dreamout

changfengpx 发表于 2017-3-14 13:36
E选项不是像og解释那样错误，最明显的错误如下：
而是错在they 跟 the animal指代不一致（英文叫do not arg ...

不是吧。animal可以做形容词的。

changfengpx

Dreamout 发表于 2017-3-14 17:33
不是吧。animal可以做形容词的。

With的用法来讲，后面要跟名词，句中这个名词只能是animal，它不可能是形容词。而animal在这句话指代复数的starfish不恰当。如果上述agreement比较难理解，还有一个简单的meaning理解就是they lose one arm，they怎么能lose only one arm，很难想象这么多starfish仅失去one arm

Dreamout

changfengpx 发表于 2017-3-14 19:29
With的用法来讲，后面要跟名词，句中这个名词只能是animal，它不可能是形容词。而animal在这句话指代复数 ...

同意！               

Dreamout

changfengpx 发表于 2017-3-14 19:29
With的用法来讲，后面要跟名词，句中这个名词只能是animal，它不可能是形容词。而animal在这句话指代复数 ...

with那里应该是独立主格。名词只能是animal

emmahiggins09

Dreamout 发表于 2017-3-14 21:30
with那里应该是独立主格。名词只能是animal

我再加一个大家这里都没有提到的错误便是sometimes 这个modifier 的位置，这个也是个非常明显的错误。 这里B和E的选项中 sometimes 这个modifier 的位置发生了改变：

E 中sometimes 修饰 the animal 作为一个 noun modifier
B 中的 sometimes 是修饰overcompensating 的一个 adv modifier

而E中的句意发生了改变，按照E的意思是 only sometimes animal replaces the lost arm
但是如果大家仔细读句子的话就会意识到句子的intended meaning 是： animal always replaces the lost arm 只不过sometimes 太过了以致于多长一两个触角。所以其实正确的sometimes 的位置应该靠近它所要修饰的词语overcompensating。 而像E这样的选项sometimes 修饰的确实animal 而不是overcompensating

这种 modifier 位置发生了改变而改变句意的考法在G中非常重要，因为这种考法考的就是近来最最流行的句意的理解

Dreamout

emmahiggins09 发表于 2017-3-14 22:30
我再加一个大家这里都没有提到的错误便是sometimes 这个modifier 的位置，这个也是个非常明显的错误。 这 ...

同意！