OG13 SC43 连词结构破题可以吗？

为了儿砸拼命冲

                                                                                                                                                                                                [size=10.000000pt]Laos has a land area about the same as Great Britainbut only four million in population, where many aremembers of hill tribes ensconced in the virtuallyinaccessible mountain valleys of the north.
                                                

                                                
• [size=10.000000pt]about the same as Great Britain but only fourmillion in population, where many
• [size=10.000000pt] of about the same size as Great Britain is, but inLaos there is a population of only four million,and many
• [size=10.000000pt] that is about the same size as Great Britain’sland area, but in Laos with a population of onlyfour million people, many of them
• [size=10.000000pt]comparable to the size of Great Britain, but onlyfour million in population, and many
• [size=10.000000pt]comparable to that of Great Britain but apopulation of only four million people, many of whom
• 
  
• 
  
• 主要想问一下,BCD里面都有“，but BLBL，”的结构，之前manhattan不是说,出现“，conj”就必须连接两个整句，这一点是不是可以说明BCD错误，因为but后面都只是prep+n或者but N, 不是整句？谢谢各位大NN
• 
  另外，E选项这什么结构, “A do B comparable to C but 量词of n ” but是个连词，我以为和and一样，前后成分要平行，结果这一个形容词后置定语，一个量词，这平行吗？再次谢谢大牛
  

                                       
                                
                        
               

为了儿砸拼命冲

自己顶一下

为了儿砸拼命冲

再顶一下

为了儿砸拼命冲

哪个NN能回答一下'，but'的问题，困扰我很久了，but后面跟一个介词到底是什么结构，不会出错吗

emmahiggins09

这道题manhattan 的RON 和 Stacy 专门挑出来讲解过。Stacy 对but 的讲解是 but 后面省略了Laos has

原帖在此，楼主去爬楼把，绝对的精华
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/laos-has-a-land-area-t5749.html

为了儿砸拼命冲

emmahiggins09 发表于 2016-12-18 02:52
这道题manhattan 的RON 和 Stacy 专门挑出来讲解过。Stacy 对but 的讲解是 but 后面省略了Laos has

原帖 ...

同意！               

为了儿砸拼命冲

"many of whom" is not a subject pronoun; it's a relative pronoun. it has EXACTLY the same grammar as plural "which".

if you understand why
i adopted two dogs, which weigh approximately 100 pounds each
or
i adopted two dogs, each of which weighs approximately 100 pounds
is not a run-on sentence, then you also understand why (e) is not a run-on sentence.

--

by contrast, if the sentence had contained "many of them", then it would be a run-on.
so:
*i adopted two dogs, they weigh approximately 100 pounds each
is a run-on sentence (--> incorrect). for the same reason,
*i adopted two dogs, each of them weighs approximately 100 pounds
and
*... a population of only 4 million people, many of them are members of hill tribes...
would also be run-on sentences (--> incorrect).

有大牛能看懂Don在表达什么吗？run-on不是句意连贯的意思吗？怎么这段话里面有点贬义的意味？ 另外请大牛总结一下本段话的核心

emmahiggins09

为了儿砸拼命冲 发表于 2016-12-19 10:59
"many of whom" is not a subject pronoun; it's a relative pronoun. it has EXACTLY the same grammar as ...

两句独立的句子需要conj 也就是连词来连接。缺少连词的两句单独的句子在语法现象就叫做 run-on.

建议楼主可以买一本曼哈顿语法，里面说的很清楚

另：这段话没有贬义的意味，楼主想多了