ChaseDream
搜索
12
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: 别贝尔
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG16 T97 COMMA AND疑惑

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2017-8-8 05:37:20 | 只看该作者
COMMA AND后面是可以不跟independent clause么?

曼哈顿sentence structure章节里说:Twocomplete sentences can be connected using a comma plus a conjunction (such asbut) to create a compound sentence. (这里的conjuction就是说的FANBOYS)

什么情况下跟independent clause?

                                                                                                        
曼哈顿上说:Any GMAT answerchoice that connects two independent clauses via only a comma is incorrect.

什么情况下是OG说的这种平行呢?
这里的平行还应该考“both。。。and。。。”




我的一些想法,欢迎讨论。




12#
发表于 2017-8-31 17:01:57 | 只看该作者
gar_bbbbb 发表于 2017-8-8 05:37
COMMA AND后面是可以不跟independent clause么?

曼哈顿sentence structure章节里说:Twocomplete sentenc ...

关于comma and的用法跟lz有一样的疑惑
看到曼哈顿之前的版本chapter 10里面有专门说
Do not use a comma before and to separate two verbs that have the same subject. Either eliminate the comma or add a subject to the second verb, creating a second main clause. Wrong: Earl walked to school, and later ate his lunch. Right: Earl walked to school and later ate his lunch. Right: Earl walked to school, and he later ate his lunch.
但是最新的第六版这个被删掉了 其他地方也没有看到有提出类似的说法

然后在OG17里面做了道题 里面这个句子
At the end of 2001, motion picture industry representatives said that there were about a million copies of Hollywood movies available online, and that they expected piracy to increase as high-speed Internet connections became more widely available.
如果按曼哈顿原来版本的说法,我觉得那个comma是多余的,不应该加,如果加了后面就应该是完整的句子而不是that从句
但是这是正确答案 所以我也confuse了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-15 09:03
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部