OG16 16 when... 与if ... OG上的解答没讲清！求各位NN指导！

dudu122

16.  Rising inventories, when unaccompanied correspondingly by increases in sales, can lead to production cutbacks that would hamper economic growth.
(A) when unaccompanied correspondingly by increases in sales, can lead
(B) when not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, possibly leads
(C) when they were unaccompanied by corresponding sales increases, can lead
(D) if not accompanied by correspondingly increased sales, possibly leads
(E) if not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, can lead

OG上的解释是这样的：
Diction; Agreement
The modifying phrase when . . . sales is needlessly difficult to understand. The adverb correspondingly is incorrectly and ambiguously used; using the adjective corresponding to modify increases in sales makes the intended meaning clearer. Unaccompanied is not wrong but not accompanied more effectively expresses the intended negation.
A Unaccompanied correspondingly is awkward and ambiguous.
B Plural subject inventories does not agree with the singular verb leads.
C Wrong tense: past tense were indicates a completed event, but can lead indicates a possibility that continues.
D Correspondingly increased sales is awkward and unclear; verb (leads) does not agree with the subject (inventories).
E Correct. Not accompanied emphasizes the negative and is preferable to unaccompanied in this usage; corresponding modifies increases in sales;
the modifier is clear and comprehensible, and there is no subject-verb agreement problem.


这个解释是不是太潦草了T T怎么就needlessly difficult to understand了呢  我还是不太能理解 when not accompanied... 和 if not accompanied...的区别
求各位NN 指导~！！谢谢~

dudu122

自己顶一下 拜托不要沉帖！！

dudu122

哦对 ！这个题 我还有一个问题 就是increase in sales 和increased sales  的区别  不可以用increased sales吗？
我做题的时候选了increased sales因为觉得它跟rising inventories更parallel

alzn2765

dudu122 发表于 2016-5-25 21:23
自己顶一下 拜托不要沉帖！！

if只能引导条件状语从句，when只能引导时间状语从句。两种从句功能完全不同啊！

alzn2765

dudu122 发表于 2016-5-25 21:27
哦对 ！这个题 我还有一个问题 就是increase in sales 和increased sales  的区别  不可以用increased sale ...

这道题的Decision Point根本不在increase in sales和increased sales，你知道或者不知道区别跟把这道题做对一点儿关系都没有。

你学习的目的是把GMAT SC题做对还是变成语法纠错机？

dudu122

alzn2765 发表于 2016-5-25 21:40
if只能引导条件状语从句，when只能引导时间状语从句。两种从句功能完全不同啊！ ...

我懂了，谢谢！

dudu122

alzn2765 发表于 2016-5-25 21:44
这道题的Decision Point根本不在increase in sales和increased sales，你知道或者不知道区别跟把这道题做 ...

我知道自己的误区了！！！> <  

alzn2765

dudu122 发表于 2016-5-25 21:48
我知道自己的误区了！！！> <

在打一枪就可以把敌人击毙的情况下，反复鞭尸毫无意义。
考试就好比打仗，分分钟要命，你恨不得一枪打死两个三个敌人，那还有功夫把一个敌人打成马蜂窝？
考试只有1分半种一个题：正确的做法是一个知识点排除3－4个选项。

dudu122

alzn2765 发表于 2016-5-25 21:59
在打一枪就可以把敌人击毙的情况下，反复鞭尸毫无意义。
考试就好比打仗，分分钟要命，你恨不得一枪打死 ...

恩！我懂了！真的很谢谢你！我觉得自己有好多误区，可能我自己都没发现！
还有就是我想请问一下ManhattanSC部分应该怎么看啊？ 我花了大半天的时间过了一遍英文原版 ，也做了笔记， 但是感觉没有太大作用。 自己还是没有系统的掌握， 感觉只是知道了一些零散的知识点 ，做题的时候也只能想到一部分。 可能是我看的方法不对？

yyy8830katrina

个人来讲，我觉得if not accompanied 比when unaccompanied要顺眼太多，而且if只能引导条件状语从句，when只能引导时间状语从句。但是即使忽略这个不去管，要知道gmat的语法题一般都不会只有一个错误点，correspondingly by increases in sales 一定是比corresponding increases in sales要冗长，而且，就像og的解释一样，correspondingly到底是在修饰unaccompanied还是修饰后面？综上，E是最佳选择