支持A,E选项看似有理,再仔细想想,跳出语法,从整体来看,把简单问题复杂化. 先看A A. Reptiles, by drawing their body heat directly from the Sun rather than burning calories to generate it, can survive on ten percent of the nourishment that a mammal of similar size would normally require
A,引起大家不舒服的,无非2点: 1,后面少个by: 有时候平行对称,要看从哪里开始对称,这句A就是从by以后开始对称,所以drawing 对 burning 完全没错,公用一个by.以前都是强调补出介词什么的,那是为了句子更加清晰,但是语法上来说,A这种绝对没错. 2,it不舒服: 其实细细品味一下,这个it还真不能少. 原句里,体热啊,卡路里啊,弄得麻烦,我来举个类似的句子,大家看看----> 小R,依靠从父亲那里索要购车款,而不是努力工作去挣这些购车款(原文的it),买下了一辆豪华轿车. 大家看其实2组相同颜色的部分,其实是平行的. 再来看E E. Reptiles, by drawing their body heat directly from the Sun instead of body heat generated by burning calories, can survive on ten percent of the nourishment that a mammal of similar size would normally require e前面有位战友分析了一下,看似比较有理,我也一开始被他说服了,说是从body head开始对称,也就是说:共享 by drawing...,粗一看,确实是一种解决方式,而且完成了一个比较完美地形式对称,但是,如果是 相对于body heat对称,句意变成了什么了? ...by drawing their body heat1 directly from the Sun instead of body heat2 generated by burning calories 大家看一下主干: by drawing sth1 instead of sth2 ,好像再说有两种body heat. drawing那种来自太阳的body heat1,而不要那种燃烧卡路里而产生的body heat2... from the sun 和 generated by burning都是作为修饰成分分别修饰body heat1 和body heat2 (如果有人要是说 draw 和from搭配,那么draw from就和body heat2就不平行: draw sth1 from somewhere / draw sth2) 其实body heat只有一种:就是生命体的体热. 只存在达成body heat的方式不同,而不存在不同种类的body Heat. 好比我们说 "胜利",只有一种胜利,那就是赢了,打败别人了...胜利没有其它的什么种类,胜利就是胜利,只有达成方式不同,不存在胜利本身有啥不同. @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ PS: E. Reptiles, by drawing their body heat directly from the Sun instead of body heat generated by burning calories, can survive on ten percent of the nourishment that a mammal of similar size would normally require e中,还有 2处蓝色平行的嫌疑.
[此贴子已经被作者于2008-5-6 2:31:26编辑过] |