ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1627|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

TEST 3 - Section II - 5

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-6-4 10:20:00 | 只看该作者

TEST 3 - Section II - 5

The extent of a nation's power over its coastal ecosystems and the natural resources in its coastal waters has been defined by two international law doctrines: freedom of the seas and adjacent state sovereignty. Until the mid-twentieth century, most nations favored application of broad open-seas freedoms and limited sovereign rights over coastal waters. A nation had the right to include within its territorial dominion only a very narrow band of coastal waters. A nation had the right to include within its territorial dominion only a very narrow band of coastal waters (generally extending three miles from the shoreline), within which it had the authority but not the responsibility, to regulate all activities, But because this area of territorial dominion was so limited, most nations did not establish rules for management or protection of their territorial waters.


Regardless of whether or not nations enforced regulations in their territorial waters. Large ocean areas remained free of controls or restrictions. The citizens of all nations had the right to use these unrestricted ocean areas for any innocent purpose including navigation and fishing. Except for controls over its own citizens, no nation had the responsibility, let alone the unilateral authority, to control such activities in international waters. And, since there were few standards of conduct that applied on the "open seas", there were few jurisdictional conflicts between nations.


The lack of standards is traceable to popular perceptions held before the middle of this century. By and large, (1) marine pollution was not perceived as a significant problem. in part because the adverse effect of coastal activities on ocean ecosystems was not widely recognized, and pollution caused by human activities was generally believed to be limited to that caused by navigation. (2) Moreover, the freedom to fish. or over fish, was an essential element of the traditional legal doctrine of freedom of the seas that no maritime country wished to see limited. (3) And finally, the technology that later allowed exploitation of other ocean resources, such as oil, did not yet exist.


To date, controlling pollution and regulating ocean resources have still not been comprehensively addressed by law, but international law--established through the customs and practices of nations -- does not preclude such efforts. And two recent developments may actually lead to future, international rules providing for ecosystem management. First, the establishment of extensive fishery zones extending territorial authority as far as 200 miles out from a country's coast, has provided the opportunity for nations individually to manage larger ecosystems. This opportunity, combined with national self-interest in maintaining fish populations could lead nations to reevaluate policies for management of their fisheries and to address the problem of pollution in territorial waters. Second, the international community is beginning to understand the importance of preserving the resources and ecology of international waters and to show signs of accepting responsibility for doing so. As an international waters and to show signs of accepting responsibility for doing so. As an international consensus regarding the need for comprehensive management of ocean resources. develops, it will become more likely that international standards and policies for broader regulation of human activities that affect ocean ecosystems will be adopted and implemented.


5. According to the passage, before the middle of the twentieth century, nations failed to establish rules protecting their territorial waters because


(A) the waters appeared to be unpolluted and to contain unlimited resources


(B) the fishing industry would be adversely affected by such rules


(C) the size of the area that would be subject to such rules was insignificant


(D) the technology needed for pollution control and resource management did not exist


(E) there were few jurisdictional conflicts over nations' territorial waters


The right key is C, i chose B, i have hightlighted the information that is pernient to the question, it does not seem to be a tough question, but I could not find answer C in the article.

沙发
发表于 2005-6-4 16:05:00 | 只看该作者

“But because this area of territorial dominion was so limited, most nations did not establish rules for management or protection of their territorial waters. ”(The last sentence of para.1)


你定位错了。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-12 02:22
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部