AAA007 感谢小女公子的文章欢迎大家继续讨论

jhleoh

以下是引用liliy4gmat在2005-7-20 9:48:00的发言：

1。fallacy analogy between differeent towns.

2. on-line survy is uncompelling. participators are limited readers of sth

3.switch to PDQ increase the cost of dilivery but can not highly increase the sales of PDQ.

For no. 3, switching to PDQ doesn't increase the cost of delivery, because it's free delivery.  However,  the author fails to mention whether selling PDQ will profit more than current pissa.  That leaves the author's conclusion on more profit made from switching to PDQ ungrounded.

Evelyn2005

The PDQ branch in our town currently sells pizza for only slightly more than our cafeteria does and has begun offering free daily deliver。

翻译：PDQ在我们镇的分支的pizza销售量只比我们咖啡店多一点。

其中的意思貌似是说他们的批萨好吃但是营销上不如我们所以应该他们做供应商我们卖。

我觉得这句话是说PDQ Pizza卖的只比我们的稍微贵一点，而且有免费送货。("Sells...for...") 意思可能是说PDQ的PIZZA比我们的更有竞争力(加上它们的survey排名)，所以我们应该switch.

xjlv128

以下是引用Evelyn2005在2006-1-17 7:39:00的发言：

The PDQ branch in our town currently sells pizza for only slightly more than our cafeteria does and has begun offering free daily deliver。

翻译：PDQ在我们镇的分支的pizza销售量只比我们咖啡店多一点。

其中的意思貌似是说他们的批萨好吃但是营销上不如我们所以应该他们做供应商我们卖。

我觉得这句话是说PDQ Pizza卖的只比我们的稍微贵一点，而且有免费送货。("Sells...for...") 意思可能是说PDQ的PIZZA比我们的更有竞争力(加上它们的survey排名)，所以我们应该switch.

崩溃！我觉得是再说他们在临镇买的很好，在这里却比我们好不到哪里去，所以我们卖PDQ应该可以increase profit吧？