ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 807|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]LSAT-4-1-25-->bigmouse转移

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-5-23 11:11:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]LSAT-4-1-25-->bigmouse转移

LSAT-4-1-25.       Because of the recent transformation of the market. Quore, Inc., must increase productivity, 10 percent over the course of the next two years, or it will certainly go bankrupt. In fact, however, Quore’s production structure is such that if a 10 percent productivity increase is possible, then a 20 percent increase is attainable.


If the statements above are true, which one of the following must on the basis of them also be true?


(A) It is only Quore’s production structure that makes it possible for Quore to survive the transformation of the market.


(B) Quore will not go bankrupt if it achieves a productivity increase of 20 percent over the next two years.


(C) If the market had not been transformed, Quore would have required no productivity increase in order to avoid bankruptcy.


(D) Because of the transformation of the market, Quore will achieve a productivity increase of 10 percent over the next two years.E


(E) If a 20 percent productivity increase is unattainable for Quore, then it must go bankrupt.



为什么不能选B? b是不是e的逆否命题阿?

沙发
发表于 2005-5-23 18:22:00 | 只看该作者
板凳
发表于 2005-5-23 18:30:00 | 只看该作者

If the increase<10%, then go bankrupt.


If 10% is possible, then 20% is also possible.(10%->20%)<=>(20%~->10%~)


E: 20%~->(10%~)->bankrupt.括号里的10%是我们从提干中推出来的。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-12 02:42
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部