--
我发现很多KPLAN的题PR里的题。有凶狠多和补充材料的题目相似,但是答案不一样 比如这到题 (although most modern-day amercian parks are either modeled on "romantic" unspoiled landscape or english garden, there are) other park designs from the italian baroque or islamic traditions that are equally worth of imitation. a although most modern-day amercian parks are either modeled on "romantic" unspoiled landscape or english garden, there are b although most modern-day amercian parks are modeled on "romantic" unspoiled landscape or english garden, c most modern-day amercian parks are either modeled on "romantic" unspoiled landscape or english garden, there are d although most modern-day amercian parks are modeled on "romantic" unspoiled landscape or english garden, and there are aslo e modeled on "romantic" unspoiled landscape or english garden, most modern-day amercian parks and aslo
答案是A
In this case, chioce B and E lack predicate in their main sentence respectively, and in chioce C, a comma falsely connects two independent sentence, and also, chioce D falsely use "and" to connect a subordinate clause with main sentence.
In a nutshell, chioce B,C,D, and E even cannot generate an intergrated sentence, so we only have chioce A, which although has obvious errors according to ETS, it is at least an integrated sentence. In real questions from ETS and real test, however, you won't meet such situation as above.
Sometimes, we are really confusing with the different answers and explanations among the different reviewing materials even for a same kind of question, and in such situation, we have to keep ourselves from indulging in these non-real questions and back to real ones. Actually, we can find obvious hints that both Kaplan and Princeton try to design questions similar to those of ETS, sometimes, even simply mimic those of ETS, especially for SC. Unlike ETS, which has a team of prestigious language specialists to design every question, and organizes peer reviews before using them, and finally each question will be qualified in the real GMAT tests, other organizations, such as Princeton, have no such affluent resources and rigorous process to guarantee the correctness of their questions and consistency with ETS. This is the reason why OG is the most valuable and only dependable reviewing material especially for SC. For other non-real questions, we have to analyze them case by case. Becasue every question from New Oriental School is a real one, according to its claim, we have to pay more attention for those from New Oriental School than for those from other resources.
As far as your second question, chioce C is right; its structure is " all one has to do is do sth, do sth and do sth", and you can find further explanation in LZM.
good Luck!
[此贴子已经被作者于2003-8-10 16:57:51编辑过] |