- UID
- 1217942
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2016-6-27
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
OG上的另外一道题(OG17编号748,OG12编号55)和这道地震波(OG17编号756,OG16编号86)的题有些类似又存在区别,说不定可以说明问题:
Many house builders offer rent-to-buy programs that enable a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to be able to move into new housing and to apply part of the rent to a purchase later.
(A) programs that enable a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to be able to move into new housing and to apply
(B) programs that enable a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to move into new housing and to apply
(C) programs; that enables a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to move into new housing, to apply
(D) programs, which enables a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to move into new housing, applying
(E) programs, which enable a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to be able to move into new housing, applying
OG上针对D、E选项末尾applying的解释是“applying following a nonrestrictive clause suggests incorrectly that the builders, not the family, are applying the rent”,也就是说,当前面是个【非限制性定从】的时候,applying就不修饰紧邻的which从句,而跑去修饰主句了(Many house builders ...)。
而地震波这道题,traveling前面是个【限制性定从】,OG就说traveling可以修饰紧邻的这个that从句,没有跑去修饰主句(geologists use ...)。
这样一来,似乎说明了GMAC承认V-ing可以修饰紧邻的限制性定从,但是不能修饰紧邻的非限制性定从。
|
|