og sc 104题，求大神伸出援助之手理理我tat

sandrababy

Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, capitalized on her keen observation and love of the natural world.

(A) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives,

(B) In her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, Beatrix Potter

(C) In her book illustrations, which she carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter

(D) Carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations

(E) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinated them with her narratives and

有大神能够详细分析一下这里出现的ving形式的语法点吗，我越看解释越不懂，越查资料越不清楚。什么是“夹心修饰”呢，这里的b事夹心修饰吗，a和b中的coordination分别错在哪里，求详细解释，谢谢！！！！

sandrababy

我对夹心修饰的理解有很严重的漏洞啊（现在补课）：来自prep08的语法笔记

关于夹心修饰 (by aeoluseros)：
所以歧义修饰，是因为引发了不同的理解，而并不是语法上是否会有不同的修饰，所谓夹心修饰也是这个原则。很多人对“夹心修饰”都有过一个误解，认为S, v-ing, V. + O.结构中，v-ing既可以往前修饰S，也可以往后修饰V就是夹心，而实际上夹心并不是“可以往前修饰S，也可以往后修饰V” 。在S, v-ing, V. + O.这样的表达中，v-ing约定俗成只伴随修饰动词，（重点！！）见下例：
prep 2-104 The yield per acre of coffee berries varies enormously, because a single tree, depending on its size and on climate and altitude, is able to produce enough berries to make between one and twelve pounds of dried beans a year.
这个句子里depending不能改为dependent，因为depending和dependent的区别在于，前者伴随修饰谓语动词is able to produce，后者则是修饰名词single tree，会造成逻辑上不对 —— “一棵树依靠它的size”。

sandrababy

capitalized和coordinating不存在合理的逻辑修饰关系（Ron）：

even if you interpret "carefully coordinating them..." as a modifier of the following clause, it doesn't make sense. specifically, it doesn't actually modify that clause: the fact that she coordinated her drawings with her stories has nothing to do with her love of the natural world.

这句话又是什么意思呢？  has nothing to do with her love?????? 真的看的不是很明白啊

sandrababy

bombx7

你具体哪不懂啊？

sandrababy

bombx7 发表于 2015-6-15 00:42
你具体哪不懂啊？

选项b不太懂，还有什么是夹心修饰呢