再问og 38

zhaozilong · 发表于 2005-10-4 11:01:00

There is actually only one name of the area in this sentance, do we have to worry the word 'there' to which it refers to?

Any advice,or comment?

zhaozilong · 发表于 2005-10-5 00:36:00

There is actually only one name of the area in this sentance, do we have to worry the word 'there' to which it refers?

any advice, please!

zhaozilong · 发表于 2005-10-5 12:41:00

zhaozilong · 发表于 2005-10-6 07:33:00

up!!

joanrain · 发表于 2005-10-6 11:43:00

我认为

1.sediments from ××sea比××sea sediments更好，因为前面说了是上面多少层的，依稀在哪里见过解释

2.当然是findings才能和growth相consistent，单纯的sediments是不行的，想当然是不科学的

3.c答案用绿色的字标出不明白为什么，里面的its指代不清，个人意见

赫赫

zhaozilong · 发表于 2005-10-14 14:10:00

Thank you, joan. very good point!

dormousedzc · 发表于 2007-12-2 00:00:00

有个问题还是非常地confused:

findings consistent with...到底是同位语,还是独立主格结构???

我个人偏向于认为是同位语,相当于findings (that are) consistent with...

OG Verbal Review上说findings refers back to
the scientists' observations. 貌似也是在暗示这是同位语从句.现在的关键就是搞清楚同位语是否能指代一句话,之前看到的例子都是有明显指代物的.

例:OG11-72,110,114 VerbalReview-16,77

NNs,help!

szy733 · 发表于 2008-1-16 12:50:00

我也不太明白

所属分类: 下线版块