ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: 薰衣紫草
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[SC总结] 比较结构中的代词选择及为谓语动词补出

[精华] [复制链接]
21#
发表于 2005-8-15 23:41:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用leader在2005-4-25 12:14:00的发言:

版主,关于第二种比较还有一个问题:


大全181. Bob Wilber became Sidney Bechet’s student and protege when he was nineteen and, for a few years in the 1940’s, came as close to being a carbon copy of the jazz virtuoso in performance as anyone has ever come.



(A) as anyone has ever come



(B) as anyone ever had been



(C) as anyone ever had done



(D) that anyone ever did


(E) that anyone ever came



看了以前的帖子,觉得没讲清楚。GEMJ说这道题要表示“迄今为止,BW都是 …”,所以要选A。A选现为什么不用done而用come?我听石林的语法串讲说go、come、become往往表示一个动态的过程,如果出现在题干中,答案一般要保留,不知道是不是这样。此外,本题为什么用anyone,而不是anyone else。




你这个帖子已经解决我很多问题,在此向你表示衷心的感谢!不过如果还有疑问,我还会贴出来。



how come the answer is not B)?

22#
发表于 2005-8-15 23:51:00 | 只看该作者


第二种比较:不同主语之间(X与Y)比较


Innits of the Bering Sea were in isolation from contact with Europeans longer than Aleuts or Inuits of the North Pacific and northern Alaska.


(A) in isolation from contact with Eurpoeans longer than
(B) isolated from contact with Eurpoeans longer than
(C)in isolation from contact with Eurpoeans longer than were
(D) isolated from contact with Eurpoeans longer than were (D)
(E) in isolation and without contact with Eurpoeans longer than


D中were绝对要补,否则产生歧义!


isolated from contact with Eurpoeans longer than from。。。补出from


我有一个疑问, 不是说受词不同时, 介词不能省略吗?


为何这里可以如此理解?


而若真的受词不可省, 此题可以理解成不需补出吗? (因为than 之后就不可能是from contact with European 的平行比较了 ??


但如此说来, 我也觉得不补不清楚, 只是我被介词可不可以省略的问题困住了, 有没有大侠可相救呢?


万分感谢!


isolated from contact with Eurpoeans longer than were。。。补出were


两种补出方式(prep. or 动词)产生的意思完全不一样,所以要补出were消除歧义。




23#
发表于 2005-8-16 23:37:00 | 只看该作者



up up please~~~

24#
发表于 2005-8-18 21:36:00 | 只看该作者
有没有路过的NN啊~~~
25#
发表于 2005-8-19 12:12:00 | 只看该作者
有介词的尽量要补出, 否则会产生例如OG那题的歧义. 但是话又说回来了, 补出与否关键是看逻辑意思是否清晰无歧义, OG的题目给出的思路是介词结构最好补出, 这点在GWD中得到一定程度的印证,但是其它结构的补出没有定论, 楼上几位还是把握好逻辑, 做题的时候尽量不要拿补出与否作为定论, 实在没有别的参考语法点帮助判断的时候再考虑补出问题.
26#
发表于 2005-8-22 17:34:00 | 只看该作者

thanks Avantasia.


But this is not my question.


请问有没有受词不同介词不可省略的这个说法呢?


如果有怎么会有补出介词的可能性呢?


谢谢!

27#
发表于 2005-8-22 18:01:00 | 只看该作者

真的是很不好意思 Avantasia! 我再说清楚一点:


我觉得如果本题若是该补出介词的话, 介词一开始就不应该省略, 因为介词的受词不同


EX he was born in 1997 not in 1979 --> here the 2nd in cannot be ommitted.


EX OG 40 In metalwork one advanage of adhesive-bonding over spot-welding is that the contract, and hence the bonding, is effected continuously over a broad surface rather than at a series of regularly spaced points with no bonding in between.


我的理解是-如果本句是比较from contact with Europeans 跟 Aleuts or Inuits of the North Pacific and northern Alaska, 是应该要补出FROM 才对, 但是根据介词后面东东不同介词不能省的立场来看, 这题要改写成


Innits of the Bering Sea were in isolation from contact with Europeans longer than (from contact) with Aleuts or Inuits of the North Pacific and northern Alaska.


在这里, from contact 因为是重复, 可以省略, 但是 with 我是认为不可以省啊?


这几天问下来, 我不禁要想, 是否我的理解错的离谱呢?


thank you very very much for your help!

28#
发表于 2005-8-25 15:49:00 | 只看该作者
Avamtasia~ thanks! I've get myself figured out!! no worries now
29#
发表于 2005-12-13 00:29:00 | 只看该作者

弱弱地问:


大全763.        The guiding principles of the tax plan released by the Treasury Department could have even a greater significance for the economy than the particulars of the plan.



(A) even a greater significance for the economy than



(B) a significance that is even greater for the economy than



(C) even greater significance for the economy than have



(D) even greater significance for the economy than do


(E) a significance even greater for the economy than have


答案是D,C和E补出have显然不对


C/E中的have补出为什么一定是错?有没有可能像OG 198那样(直接补出主体动词---confronted),这里的have作为实意动词而非助动词补出。


30#
发表于 2006-1-14 04:48:00 | 只看该作者

First, thanks a lot. However, don't agree with you in OG198. It might be helpful if you read the replanation of OG and check this article out.


http://www.chasedream.com/show.aspx?id=1109&cid=41 Very nice article.



Best,  NM

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-4-20 07:30
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部