[原创]promote自己的时候,请别拿中欧说事儿了

yizhenghan

以下是引用落花流水在2005-3-15 11:22:00的发言：

拒绝长江的理由

1，长江还没有得到教育部的学位认可。
2，长江没有得到任何国际认证。在国际上没有知名度和排名。
3，长江没有严格意义的学生交换计划。交换名额有限，并且存在很大的不确定因素。
4，长江的国际化程度极低，没有国际化的视野，也阻碍了英语能力的提高。
5，长江没有强大的校友网络，在职业市场上处于劣势。
6，长江的教授水平参差不齐，离世界级还有很大的差距。
7，长江的管理层好大喜功，没有脚踏实地的专业精神。
8，长江还没有自己的校园，硬件设施远不及中欧和科大。

9, 长江的奖学金只是诱人的幌子。由于奖学金的人为操作，曾导致众多学生中途退学。

10，长江的学费堪称亚洲之最，但他目前的毕业生薪水也就在120，000和150，000之间，远低于中欧和科大，投资回报率是最低的。

楼上的说的太对了,按这个标准,我希望这个落花流水"是一个人,更希望这个人只代表自己. otherwise,shame on that..."

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-3-15 14:33:18编辑过]

yizhenghan

以下是引用CEIBS_MBA2005在2005-3-16 8:47:00的发言：


strongly suppot 别就拿别人来说事儿

以下是引用CEIBS_MBA2005在2005-3-3 0:23:00的发言： I challenge you, grossman

CKGSB is a good school. And grossman is good too.

But I want to challenge you, grossman, you defend CK unhesitatingly MERELY because you really think that CK is a place where you can fulfill all that you desired as you had claimed? Or because something else?

At least four people have switched from CEIBS to CK during last three years. As everyone can easily figure out, it is not so-called “career development”, but quite opposite, the money that attracted these four people, including Dean Xiang himself, to be CK. The reason is simple, even three years ago, CEIBS is acclaimed as top business school in mainland and at that time CK is nothing. Why were such four smart guys not willing to stay at the GROWING, PROMISING, RESPECTED, and GOVERNMENT-SPONSORED business school in which they have many things to be proud of? Why switched to a brand-new one that they have the same function, same position, same title? Handsome payment can only give us satisfactory explanation.

Dear friends, suppose you are one of them, you are working with such leading university as laceName>PeikinglaceName> laceType>UniversitylaceType> as a professor, and now a billionaire want hire you with the same salary and same status in another institute that nobody knows, what kind of decision would you make?

I am not blaming such behaviors because pursuit of physical rewards, say money, is feasible. That is something can really bring us good life, right? What I am saying is that you, grossman, should not do such humiliatory things as compromise or discrediting the reputation of your previous work place just because you want to please your new boss. Such activity would definitely be considered discredit. NOT ALL PEOPLE who breast-feed you is your MONTHER, remember?

Of course I am not criticizing Mr. Li Ka-shing neither. I have no right to do so, and I know this precisely. Mr. LI is a respected business leader and I firmly believe that most students, MBAs or EMBAs, of CEIBS actually admire him and are inspired by him. But please do not mix up Mr. Li with some staffs working in CK. Do not ABUSE his name for God sake, ok? That will backfire. That is something is opposite to Mr.Li’s will.

And if you guys insist to do so, I mean, abuse. Ok, I can readily cite one simple fact to warn you, the fact that has been demonstrated by hundreds and thousands historical events in our 5000-year long history.

No businessman is popular all the time.

(Forgive me, Mr. Li, my role model, I really do not want to curse you. Forgive me)  

既然CEIBS_MBA2005这么支持不拿别人说事,又为什么如此肯定到长江的工作人员就是为了钱呢?作为中欧的一员,这难道没有拿别人说事的嫌疑?还是中欧的工作人员都是无偿工作的?

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-3-16 9:19:37编辑过]