ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1458|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[argument] 第一篇ARGUMENT 希望大家给点建议 另:有谁想作文互该么?QQ联系~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-9-24 16:37:38 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
This observed phenomenon that the arctic deer only can search for food by moving over ice from island to island during some of the year, the plant, which is arctic deer’s food, can merely live in the warm environment and the recent global warming, has significantly contributed, and thus is causal to the decline in deer population. These reasons seem logical; however, if we seek the further reason, the evidence provided in this argument is not sufficient to validate the assumption.



The information that arctic deer, living on island in Canada’s arctic region, can only travel from island to island by the moving ice seems insufficient evidence to conclude that the declining of the deer’s population because of those melt ice which is result from the global warming trend. Shall we credit the information that the entire islands in Canada’s arctic region, which arctic deer live are entirely separated to the other ground? Of course, no and we seem to neglect one possibility that some of the island is the byland, where the arctic dears can detour the sea to move on another land having the abundant plant for the dears. The arctic deer also can swim though the sea or just jump by the rock. Thus, the assumption that the population of the dears decreasing because they are unable to follow their age-old migration patterns across the frozen sea is groundless.



Additionally, it is the local hunter that report the fact that the deer populations are declining, which is very doubt about what is the real factor leads to dwindling the number of the dears. The hunters would like to be suspicious that they are the real murders, killing the dears and attributing the shrink of those died dears to the external factor, such as the limited food and the capricious climate, causing deer could not live in their old patterned living habit, try to mask their crime deliberately. Plus, the hunters reported that it is the deer populations that reduced. The words the deer do not indicate the details about deer’s species, which could be the arctic or some other deer, and confuse us about that what the actual number of died arctic dears. Besides, the author concludes that the populations of the deer are declining from the hunter, only few people investigated in the issue, which make the conclusion seems skeptical. Therefore, any decision aimed at addressing the problem of the decreased populations of the deer must be based on more thorough investigation to gather sufficient data in order to narrow down and locate the actual causes of the problem.



The authors assume that the deer’s being unable to follow their age-old migration patterns across the frozen sea result in the purported decline in deer population. It appears reasonable, therefore, for the sorrow consequence that the starvation is probably one reason of the declining population of the dears. However, do they merely eat one kinds of plant stained in the warm areas? The explanation, I think, is unacceptable.~~~.

They can eat lichen or the moss; the very common plants on the tundra, for that they could not wait the right time, the course of the year where the ice break and move from one ground to another, to pursuit their food. Stepping back, even the recent global warming leads to the ice melt the warmer surround is beneficial for the diversity of the plants. Those make the deer have more alternative food to eat and avoid staving.



In a nutshell, the factors that are the melt ice, which is result from the global warming trend, the saying of the local hunter, who cannot be believed entirely and the starving, which is the result of less diversified food because of the climate, can not be acceptable. Further investigation should be made on this issue.

(诚心想结交能够作文互改的QQ好友  相互督促逆袭  有意者请加QQ1558779444 备注附:CD GRE互该  谢谢大家 希望能和你们一起成长


收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-9-25 09:30:15 | 只看该作者
内容很充实,可以组织一下段落结构,有明显的过渡和递进来帮助别人理解中心主题。学会引导读者的眼睛和思维。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2012-9-25 13:42:35 | 只看该作者
不是能很理解普渡哥的意思。转折和递进?是增加些转折词 过渡句么?段落结构中理由的说明要怎么才能体现递进关系?感觉理由都是并列的么?
PS  普渡哥 这篇文章的语法错误多么?
谢谢普渡哥
地板
发表于 2012-9-25 22:28:55 | 只看该作者
第一段中第一句话,phenomenon有三个同位语成分并列,都需要that引导的。
你注意下你的内容安排,很明显2、3段比较多而4、5段比较单薄
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-1 03:05
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部