开帖讨论今年3月的作文题目

往事如风

Because people are busy with doing so many things, they can do few things well. Do you agree or disagree？

这里有两篇作文，一个是SOME-ONE写的，一个是我写的。我在二楼和三楼会分别粘帖一下。

这里有个问题想请教。

这篇文章可不可以像GMAT的ISSUE那样写：开头：这个题目隐藏的假设是一个人能不能做好事情是由他做事情的数量决定的。然而，它却没有足够的理由来支持这个假设。在现实生活中，一个人是否能做好事情，当然会受到事情数量的限制，但是我认为还有更多的原因来影响它。比如：一个人的责任感，它合理利用资源的能力，这个人自身的潜力等。

下面四段：第一段写数量有些影响。而后一个过渡句，但是起不到决定作用

第二段：一个人做事情的责任感play an important role.

第三段：合理利用资源equeal importance.

第四段：这个人自身的 also important.

往事如风

Because people are busy with doing so many things, they can do few things well. Do you agree or disagree？

10:30

We have to face a large amount of things every day. In order to do these things well, we must find an efficient way. Some people believe that if we deal with few things one time, we can do these things well. The reason is that we will have more energy and more time to do few things. Other people argue that even if we do many things once, we can do these things well. However, I strongly hold the opinion that people are able to do many things once well for three reasons.

First, we can use our intelligence to integrate different things. There are some relationships among different things. As long as we observe them carefully, we can find the relationship easily. Then, we can use these relationships to handle many things one time and integrate as in a whole. Like pearls, the different things, can be on a line with the relationships which function as a thread. For example, some academic knowledge are used in my part time job immediately. In turn, these impractical experience allow me to know the academic knowledge more sufficiently when I study in class. Also, I attend some extra-curricula activities, what I learn from part time work let me communicate with other members successfully. Through finding the innate relationships among different things, I not only can deal with many things one time, but also can handle them successfully and let them support each other.

Second, from the view of psychology, when we do many things crossly, we would obtain more inspiration, more energy. We would be boring to do one thing during a long time. Especially , when we are in troubles, we will do not have patience to achieve the miss. However, the situation will be different when we do many things one time. When we are boring to do one thing, we can turn to an interesting one; when we are in difficulties, we can do some easier one; when we find a new methodology to do a kind of things, we can practice the methodology right away. When we do one thing a long time and change to another, it is a process of relaxation as well. Through this process of exchange, we can get some inspiration and energy from other things. For example, I am tiered of writing essays because I do not know how to organize the sentences. Thus, I do some grammar assignment instead. Surprisingly, I find the grammar knowledge is very helpful to organize sentences. In other words, I mean I get some skills to organize sentences through studying grammar. There are a lot of examples to prove that we will benefit to do things crossly.

In conclusion, although there are some advantages to do few things one time, I strongly maintain that we are able to do many things well one time. As long as we can observe things carefully, we will benefit from many things and find the skill to integrate them as a whole. We will do not fell boring, when we do many things one time as well.

往事如风

With the increasing pace of life in modern society, people are busy doing so many things that someone starts to doubt whether they can really achieve any thing out of these demanding tasks. While from my point of view, I believe that people are trying to dealing with more things than before does not necessarily harm the consequences, due to the adoption of high technology, time management, and full exploration of people's potentiality.

 Above all, one reason I hold is that high technology does raise the productivity of human beings, so that one person can handle much more work than before. For instance, the prevalence of computer and kinds of software, such as SAS, SPSS, has lifted up the efficiency of researchers dramatically. Since when doing analysis, what researchers need to do is just to input the original data into the computer and to switch several simple buttons. Well, without such kind of software, it may probably take a person years of time to calculate the results, even the amount of data is not so much. With the help of computer and some other facilities, such as the rapid transportation, like airplane and cars, people can finish their job within a limited time.

 Another reason why I disagree with the statement is that people nowadays are much more concerned about time management. While people just didn't care about time until watch came into being until 19th century, people now count time almost they do everything, even when eating, walking, or bathing. Why? Because they want to manage their time well in order that they can accomplish more. I have discovered that many students are doing much better at making schedules and trying to stick to them.  

  In addition, I hold the opinion that we have much more potential than we can perceive now. Even though we may feel busy it is hard for us to finish several things simultaneously, the result is likely to bring about miracle if we can try harder and in a right way. That is also why people are often surprised with their own achievements that they can not even imagine before.

Well, though I disagree with the saying that people can do few things well when they are busy doing many things, I still believe that work is not the whole story in life. We should consider about other things, like pleasure or hobbies. Work and pleasure together can make a more enjoyable life. And much more probably, we can do well when we do one thing or two at the same time.

 In conclusion, considering about the factors increasing people's productivity and efficiency in dealing with jobs, I don't agree with the statement that if people busy doing many things, few thins can be done well.

 Words: 462    Time: 31 minutes