ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1905|回复: 9
打印 上一主题 下一主题

519报分 安徽 犹豫要不要重考的瘸腿分数

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-6-7 10:39:00 | 只看该作者

519报分 安徽 犹豫要不要重考的瘸腿分数

虽然总分够了,但是口语太差了,三个fair,唉,犹豫要不要重考。不知道学校对单项的要求是不是这么严格。各位知道情况的给点建议啊。

Test Test Date Reading Listening Speaking Writing Total
TELXMLMay 18, 200730 29 19 27 105




Reading  Skills Level  Your Performance  
ReadingHigh(22-30)

Test takers who receive a score at the HIGH level, as you did, typically understand academic texts in English that require a wide range of reading abilities regardless of the difficulty of the texts.

Test takers who score at the HIGH level, typically

  • have a very good command of academic vocabulary and grammatical structure;
  • can understand and connect information, make appropriate inferences, and synthesize ideas, even when the text is conceptually dense and the language is complex;
  • can recognize the expository organization of a text and the role that specific information serves within the larger text, even when the text is conceptually dense; and
  • can abstract major ideas from a text, even when the text is conceptually dense and contains complex language.
 
Listening  Skills Level  Your Performance  
ListeningHigh(22-30)

Test takers who receive a score at the HIGH level, as you did, typically understand conversations and lectures in English that present a wide range of listening demands. These demands can include difficult vocabulary (uncommon terms, or colloquial or figurative language), complex grammatical structures, abstract or complex ideas, and/or making sense of unexpected or seemingly contradictory information.

When listening to lectures and conversations like these, test takers at the HIGH level typically can

  • understand main ideas and important details, whether they are stated or implied;
  • distinguish more important ideas from less important ones;
  • understand how information is being used (for example, to provide evidence for a claim or describe a step in a complex process);
  • recognize how pieces of information are connected (for example, in a cause-and-effect relationship);
  • understand many different ways that speakers use language for purposes other than to give information (for example, to emphasize a point, express agreement or disagreement, or convey intentions indirectly); and
  • synthesize information, even when it is not presented in sequence, and make correct inferences on the basis of that information.
 
Speaking  Skills Level  Your Performance  
Speaking about familiar topicsFair(2.5 - 3.0)

Your responses indicate you are able to speak in English about your personal experiences and opinions in a mostly clear and coherent manner. Your speech is mostly clear with only occasional errors. Grammar and vocabulary are somewhat limited and include some errors. At times, the limitations prevent you from elaborating fully on your ideas, but they do not seriously interfere with overall communication.

 
Speaking about campus situationsFair(2.5 - 3.0)

Your responses demonstrate an ability to speak in English about reading material and experiences typically encountered by university students. You are able to convey relevant information about conversations, newspaper articles, and campus bulletins; however, some details are missing or inaccurate. Limitations of grammar, vocabulary, and pronunciation at times cause difficulty for the listener. However, they do not seriously interfere with overall communication.

 
Speaking about academic course contentFair(2.5 - 3.0)

Your responses demonstrate that you are able to speak in English about academic reading and lecture material, with only minor communication problems. For the most part, your speech is clear and easy to understand. However, some problems with pronunciation and intonation may occasionally cause difficulty for the listener. Your use of grammar and vocabulary is adequate to talk about the topics, but some ideas are not fully developed or are inaccurate.

 
Writing  Skills Level  Your Performance  
Writing based on reading and listeningGood(4.0 - 5.0)

You responded well to the task, relating the lecture to the reading. Weaknesses, if you have any, might have to do with

  • slight imprecision in your summary of some of the main points and/or
  • use of English that is occasionally ungrammatical or unclear.
 
Writing based on knowledge and experienceGood(4.0 - 5.0)

You responded with a well-organized and developed essay. Weaknesses, if you have any, might have to do with

  • use of English that is occasionally ungrammatical, unclear, or unidiomatic and/or
  • elaboration of ideas or connection of ideas that could have been stronger.

沙发
发表于 2007-6-7 10:46:00 | 只看该作者
分享一下阅读和听力的经验好吗?
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2007-6-7 11:17:00 | 只看该作者

阅读可能一直还不错,过去靠四六级都是阅读满篇生词,结果做题结果都不错的,再加上读研期间常读英文paper。我就把delta做完了,然后揣摩一下og上的真题思路。平时练习时一定要限制好时间,养成第一感觉答题,这样时间就不会不够了。

听力也是做delta加上听旧托听力素材。本来自己听力也不好,2年来听的英语仅限于美剧,大三考bec时听力就是个不及格。听托福的学术素材根本没有感觉,练了20天后感觉提高了不少。

地板
发表于 2007-6-7 12:16:00 | 只看该作者

听力怎么练习的,讲讲啊,20天能长这么多吗

5#
发表于 2007-6-7 16:34:00 | 只看该作者
楼主,能主要说说听力吗?想听你说一下你听学术听力的感觉,介绍一下整个过程吧,譬如说你能听懂到什么程度,你感觉到的进步具体是怎么样的??多谢了
6#
发表于 2007-6-7 19:26:00 | 只看该作者

恭喜!!!

LZ分数已经很不错了!!!!

7#
 楼主| 发表于 2007-6-8 23:24:00 | 只看该作者

练学术听力开始常常听不懂比较生僻的学科的整段话。后来就看文字资料后不停的重听重听。包括听一些阅读认识但听力听不出的学术词语,听连音爆破等等。觉得这种精听还是很有作用的。

最后的状态基本是听老托福听力基本都能听懂95%。

8#
发表于 2007-6-9 07:28:00 | 只看该作者

20 就可以吗?是全职练习吗?

9#
发表于 2007-6-9 19:40:00 | 只看该作者
多谢楼主
10#
 楼主| 发表于 2007-6-9 23:27:00 | 只看该作者
不是全职啊,每天复习时间不算多,估计一周24小时左右吧
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: TOEFL / IELTS

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-25 20:26
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部