求问一题

噜啦啦biu

A recent court decision has qualified a 1998 ruling that workers cannot be laid off if they have been given reason to believe that their jobs will be safe, provided that their performance remains satisfactory.
Aif they have been given reason to believe that their jobs will 分析该选项
Bif they are given reason for believing that their jobs would still 分析该选项
Chaving been given reason for believing that their jobs would 分析该选项
Dhaving been given reason to believe their jobs to 分析该选项
Egiven reason to believe that their jobs will still

求问各位做这道题的思路~我选的B 正确答案为A   其他几个选项也麻烦帮解答下~谢谢

噜啦啦biu

自己顶

xsq805

我的思路如下：
首先是 for believing 和 to believe的split, 这里后者更好，for doing 表示直接动作通常是错的，所以 B 和 C不对
其次是 if，having been，和given 的split，if和后两个成分不同，后面两个都是modifier，没有逗号的情况下做限定性修饰，应该修饰最近的名词，然而，这里很显然不对。因为修饰对象是worker，可是worker离得太远了，所以D和E不对，最后剩下A了

NicholeNn

A和B最主要的差别还是时态：
A if they have been given reason to believe that their jobs will
B if they are given reason for believing that their jobs would still
追忆看看原句划线外的时态provided that their performance remains satisfactory.

workers cannot be laid off if blablabla...., provided that their performance remains satisfactory, 从句意角度理解是不是，工人认为他们现在的表现好(一般现在时),所以他们认为他们的工作将是安全的(一般将来时），court decision 裁定这种人不能被解雇。这里的will be safe是基于remains satisfactory下的结论，而不是虚拟语气：如果他们过去表现好的话（潜在意思他们过去没表现好），和原句意思不同并且语意上也说不通。

CDE还是走句意角度,Ving/Ved在这里做noun modifier，但是划横线的句子应该是针对cannot be laid off来说的，而不是针对workers。

噜啦啦biu

NicholeNn 发表于 2017-11-6 09:32
A和B最主要的差别还是时态：
A if they have been given reason to believe that their jobs will
B if th ...

抱抱Nichole~很清楚~

NicholeNn

噜啦啦biu 发表于 2017-11-7 08:27
抱抱Nichole~很清楚~

通过这道题可以做的“下一题”总结是：
1.if和不加逗号的Ving同时出现在选项时候的考点：到底是想修饰句子(if)还是主语(Ving without comma)
2.如果选项间时态不一致时，可能考点：和划线外部分的时态是否能衔接

噜啦啦biu

NicholeNn 发表于 2017-11-7 09:52
通过这道题可以做的“下一题”总结是：
1.if和不加逗号的Ving同时出现在选项时候的考点：到底是想修饰句 ...

  在准备托福 还过来帮我~！
我会把这样的思路在纵向总结的时候 都写写  ~

NicholeNn

噜啦啦biu 发表于 2017-11-7 14:20
在准备托福 还过来帮我~！
我会把这样的思路在纵向总结的时候 都写写  ~ ...

偶尔过来逛下，看到你发帖了就回答下嘿嘿