又是with 的问题

ashlyzhu

Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the elephant is descendedfrom an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolving as a kind of snorkel.
(A) that suggests that the elephant is descended from anaquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolving
(B) that has suggested the elephant descended from anaquatic animal, its trunk originally evolving
(C) suggesting that the elephant had descended from anaquatic animal with its trunk originally evolved
(D) to suggest that the elephant had descended from anaquatic animal and its trunk originally evolved
(E) to suggest that the elephant is descended from anaquatic animal and that its trunk originally evolved


答案是E，可是解释说C的with 部分结构错误，错在哪里啊？

ashlyzhu

定顶一下。。。。。。。。。。

lifeisanart

同问。
感觉WITH有修饰anaquatic animal的嫌疑。
可是OG上说是因为不能跟在独立句子后面。为什么？

lifeisanart

说错了：OG上的解释是WITH后面不能跟独立的句子。
这是我摘得别人的解释

从e中可以看到，its trunk originally evolved 是一个完整独立的句子。而with结构一般是加名词，或者是独立主格结构，是不能加完整的句子的。所以c后半句是错误的。如果你把evolved硬要认为是done，符合独立主格，那么也是逻辑不同，它的trunk怎么可能被进化呢