923考试~发几篇作文，欢迎所有形式的拍砖、指导！！谢过大家啦！！~~~~

芒果15号

Do you agree or disagree that people who go out from their village will be more successful and happier than people who stay in their village?
What is successful? What is happiness? As far as I am concern, successful is not millions of money or eminent status, it is a fulfillment of the personal value and a sense of honor and achievement. Happiness, the aim that all human being strike so hard to pursue, is a feeling a being needed and a good relationship with people we loved. Someone goes out from their village to court successful and happy, which seems to me, is not necessary. Living in the village will gain more success and become happier.
To start with, life in the village is less stressful. Unlike those people who work every day until the midnight just to compete for a promotion in the city, all the things for people who live in village to do is just to drive the machine to plant crops while enjoying the peace and green that the nature bring. When the fall comes each year, seeing that all the crops become yellow and mature, a feeling of successful rises in village people’s hearts.
Moreover, it is simpler to deal with the relationship for people in the village than in city, and relationship to happy is what foundation to skyscraper. There is an old saying in china that children should not travel far when their parents are alive. Although someone may think such saying is outdated, but it is still meaningful for me. As our parents start aging, they need us to take care of them, just like what they did to us when we were young. Living in village to get closer to our parents gives us the opportunity to look after our parents, and makes us feel that we are needed, which is also key element of happiness. In addition, we have more friends in the place where we grow up, and it is easier for us to build the social network in our home “village”.
Last but not least, the environment is so much greater in the village than in the city. No one can deny the importance of the environment to people. Living in a place where the air is so fresh and clean, the water is so pure and blue, the mountain are so green, and when walk on the road can even the smell of the fragrance of the beautiful flower is really an enjoyment. People will feel they have every amazing thing that life can offers, so why won’t people feel successful and happy living in such a wonderful place—the village.
In conclusion, living in the village is simpler and less stressful, and provide us a better living environment, which all give us a sense of successful and happiness. So why not live in the village?

芒果15号

Do you agree or disagree the following statement? The most important problems in today’s world will be solved in our lifetime.
Will the air become fresh and clean again regardless where it is in only 100 years? Will all the river and ocean turn to limpid and all the marine animals won’t extinct in merely 100 years? Will all the rainforests turn to their original appearances and won’t be destructed again in a 100-year period? I severely doubt it. As far as I am concerned, the most important problem in the world today—the environment issue will not be solve in our lifetime, and only generations of people work hard and seriously on this problem together can it be solved one day in the future.

To begin with, the air pollution will not be address in a relatively short period in lots of developing countries. China, for example, has developed very fast since 1980’s. As the expansion of the industrialization, people sacrifice the environment in exchange for the temporary economic gain. There is a steel plant near my high school, every time I look toward north, large amount of smoke go up to the sky. The sky is seldom blue and I have never seen real stars at the age of 8. Workers in the steel factory became sick, but still a lot of young people want to join in that factory for relatively high payment, so the factory still running very well regardless the serious air pollution it generated. Such circumstances are common in many developing countries, and as time is needed for the improvement of technology to reduce the pollution, this issue cannot be settled in a short period.

Moreover, the water pollution, which become even more severe today than in the past, can hardly be solve in next 100 years. Considering an increasing number of oil spill incidents happened around the world during the recent years, it takes a long time to pure the sea water and restore the marine ecosystem. Additionally, large amount of factories emit wasted water and bury tons of trash to the river and sea, making the conditions even worse. Only by stopping such actions, which is impossible in some areas, and by collaboration of the countries around the world to solve the water pollution issue, can the river and ocean turn back to their original condition. Apparently, it will take so long to fulfill that it won’t be achieved in our life time.

Last but not least, the acreage of rainforest is decreasing annually. Even though people stop destroy the forest and start to plant trees to restore the forest ecosystem, it takes very long time for the seed to grow up to tall plants. Not to mention the time it will take to educate people cease cutting trees for profit and to protect the planet we live and the resources we will pass to the next and next generations.

In conclusion, environment problem, the most important issue in the world, will not be solved in our life time. The expansion of industrialization, the selfish behavior of thousands of factories, and the lack of education are the serious obstacles in addressing the environment issue. I hope our environment will become so great one day, and I know it will happen in very far future.

芒果15号

Colleges or universities should offer more courses to prepare student for the future before they start working.
People won’t understand how helpless it is for college students who start to work unless they experience that the boss request them to do a job that he thought easily but the students did not learn it from the college and did not want to lose face in front of the co-workers. If the colleges and universities offer more practical courses for students to make a better preparation for their job, then the students will not often encounter such embarrass circumstances. So I absolutely support this proposal.

To start with, offer more useful courses for the future job will increase the students’ competitive force in the job market, and correspondingly enhance the school’s image. Cornell University, for example, is famous for its hospitality management education. It is said that Cornell offers students majoring in hospital management a lot of practical knowledge and strategies, and all the students graduate from this major are so excellent that big companies are competing to employ them. How wonderful it could be for students, colleges and companies. So why not colleges and universities provide more courses to prepare students for future before they start to work?

Moreover, it benefits the companies a lot to put this proposal into practice. Imagine how many training cost companies can save if their operating stuff are well educated in the school and process experienced skills. My uncle’s company has nearly 100 employees. Take the marketing department as an example, the sales man will be trained twice each year, and it costs the company thousands of dollars for each time, not to mention the training spending of all the departments in his company. If all the marketing knowledge and selling strategies are taught at school, they can save large amount of money which can be used to raise the employees’ salaries. If all the companies can save the training cost, then people will have a wealthier life and consume more products which will lead to an increasing of GDP.

However, we should see that some college students can learn those useful courses and master professional skills from Internet or other channels, and they may consider studying these courses in school is a waste of time. In addition, some skills can only be developed be rich experiences, so the courses that the school can offer are limited.

In conclusion, from my perspective, college should offer students more practical courses to make a better preparation for their job, because it will benefit the students, school, companies, and even society. Although there are some disadvantages about this policy, the merits outweigh those concerns.

芒果15号

A or D: It’s more important for the government to spend money to build art museums and music performance center than to build recreational facilities (such as swimming pool, playgrounds).

Do you want to visit the art museums on weekend with your best friend to appreciate the fascinating art works? Would you like to go to the music performance center with your boyfriend in a romantic night to enjoy the beautiful music? I can never refuse the attraction of the art, every time after I listened to a pieces of classical music, I feel calm and cheerful. Therefore, I cannot agree more for the government to spend money to build museums and music performance center rather than swimming pool or playground.

To start with, building art museums and music center enrich citizen’s entertainment life and offers more accesses for normal people to learn real art. I have been to an art museum once when I went to Shenyang, and it was amazing. On the past, I can only enjoy the painting of masterpiece from book and internet. When I walked in the museum and saw the real “antique”, I felt so excited, and I could look at each pictures and sculpture in details. It was a superb memory that I visited the museum for three hours while chatting with my best friend. In my opinion, all the citizens could have the opportunity to have this great experience, as long as the government builds the museum in the city.

Moreover, compared with swimming poor and ground, which people can see everywhere, museum and music performance center are quite rare. Individuals can hardly raise large amount of money to build a grand influential museum, and such places can only be prosperous by the government’s support. However, it is not that necessary for government to build as recreational facilities used for exercise, because individuals and companies can do that. Even there is no ground in the city, people can still jog in the community or street.

In addition, it can encourage artists to create more great works if the government can build the art museum and music performance center. More excellent art pieces mean more culture legacy, which can benefit the whole human beings. Plus, an influential performance center with unique structure will attract more tourism. The Sydney Opera House, for example, the landmark of Sydney, even Australia, appeal to millions of people all around the world.

In conclusion, it is not only necessary but also valuable for the government to spend money to build museums and music performance center rather than swimming pool or playground. It can enrich people’s entertainment life, boost the development of art and attract more tourists to the city.