【求助】OG13 sc 58

sherry2012

that educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said that it is their fault: Alvin Toffler, one of the most prominent student of the future, did not even mention microcomputer in future shock, published in 1970.

A. that educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said that it is their fault

B.  that educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said to be at fault

C. it can hardly be said that it is the falut of educators who have not anticipated the impact of the microcomputer technology.

D. it can hardly be said that educators  are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology

E. the fact that educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology.


这道题就是分析不出他要考什么考点那！！

主语从句就not preferred麼？

还有C我也觉得挺好的为啥选D不选C呢？

求牛人解答！

jiaoguitar

C出现了两个it，而且这两个it明显指代对象并不同。并且把强调句嵌套在宾语从句中也不是GMAC喜欢的句式。

sherry2012

这里C木有强调句吧

lttbelief

首先 C的it is 很啰嗦 其次 C的从句缺谓语

naryi

C没有D简洁  考了一个句子的简洁性吧 it作形式主语,at fault是好的说法，在曼哈顿语法中有

15801218581

我觉得是逻辑意思的问题。题目想表达的是“educators没有预测XXX，这不是他们的错”；而C说的educators加了定语从句修饰，就变成了 “那些没有预测XXX的educators是没错的”，意思改变，所以C不好。这种又长又烂的题，我都是用看大意解决的。。。再用这种方法看B，把can前面的简称为一件事，那么B的意思就是（educators没有预测XXX）这件事很难说是有错的，而一件事是客观发生的，不能说有没有错，只能说人有没有错，所以B也不好。哎，大概就是这样子你体会下~不过这种看大意的方法的最大缺点就是心里没底，因为不是像平行、句子结构那种铁板钉钉的语法错误

soulwangh

A 没有语法错误但是相比正确答案要啰嗦，B是主语谓语在逻辑上不一致，如楼上所说应该是人be at fault而不是一个客观事实。c选项it 没有可以指代的名词性从句。E是一个句子碎片，没有谓语。