ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3070|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

SOS T-T: 求赐教。。。6个有悖常理的题目。。。求大侠赐教

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-6-20 16:45:33 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
当然或许不是有悖常理。。。是我比较新手啦 呵呵

221.    (26471-!-item-!-188;#058&002027)    (GWD-12-Q34)

In an attempt to guarantee the security of its innovative water purification method, the company required each employee to sign a confidentiality agreement ****prohibiting that its water purification methods be disclosed to companies**** using an analogous purification process.  
A. prohibiting that its water purification methods be disclosed to companies
B. prohibiting them from the disclosing of its water purification methods to any company
C. prohibiting disclosure of its water purification methods to any company
D. that would prohibit them from disclosure of its water purification methods to companies
E. that would prohibit its water purification methods to be disclosed to a company

答案选C,当然是没问题的。。但是由此我遇到一个疑问,就是记得XDF老师跟我们说过,一般来说在一些比较虚的名词后面都是要直接加 that 引导的,比如 hypothesis , theory 等等。  那到了这一题的 agreement里就没有加 that,这是怎么回事?




233.    (31606-!-item-!-188;#058&006061)    (GWD-12-Q32)

Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush was a relatively easy task, ****because of erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity put gold literally within reach for**** anybody with a pan or shovel.
A. because of erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity put gold literally within reach for
B. because of erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and volcanic activity that thrust ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds to the surface, and putting gold literally within reach of
C. owing to erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and volcanic activity that had thrust ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds to the surface, and putting gold literally within reach of
D. since erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and volcanic activity that thrust ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds to the surface, putting gold literally within reach for
E. since erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity put gold literally within reach of

答案选的E,可是我记得很清楚XDF老师跟我们说过 since一般不在GMAT中表“因为”啊,最重要的是以前做OG,OG里面也说过类似的话。  怎么到了GWD里就把这些“潜规则”都推翻了。








235.    (25121-!-item-!-188;#058&001450)    (GWD-9-Q1)

A mixture of poems and short fiction, Jean Toomer's Cane has been called one of the three best novels ever written by ****Black Americans—the others being Richard Wright, author of Native Son, and Ralph Ellison, author of Invisible Man****
A. Black Americans—the others being Richard Wright, author of Native Son, and Ralph Ellison, author of Invisible Man
B. Black Americans—including Native Son by Richard Wright and Invisible Man by Ralph Ellison
C. a Black American—including Richard Wright, author of Native Son, and Ralph Ellison, author of Invisible Man
D. a Black American—the others being Richard Wright, author of Native Son, and Ralph Ellison, author of Invisible Man
E. a Black American—the others being Richard Wright's Native Son and Ralph Ellison's Invisible Man

又是GWD里的,又是一个有点点有悖常理的题目,答案选E
我记得我们老师说    N+being+ adj/n/done 都是错的,怎么这一题对了?因为那个破折号?
而且我觉得B选项那么好,难道就是因为  XX书 BY XX 人 和主句里的 XX人’s XX书的形式不一样?这也太死板了吧, 按意思理解的话B选项也是蛮严格的啊,只不过表达形式稍有不同




238.    (26655-!-item-!-188;#058&002088)    (GWD-4-4)

A new hair-growth drug is being sold for three times the price, per milligram, ***as*** the drug's maker charges for another product with the same active ingredient.
A. as
B. than
C. that
D. of what
E. at which

答案是C,当然没问题
可是E错在哪儿,错在at?
如果说E错我还可以理解,因为词典里查不到 charge at XX price这一说法
可是D怎么错的
比较用法里面明明有一个    XX  is n times + 比较单位 + of + YY 的用法。(这种用法百度一搜一大堆)
如  Tian’an men Square is 10000 times the size of my square.
怎么D又错了??


249.    (27345-!-item-!-188;#058&002345)    (GWD-10-Q36:GWD-11-19)

In Hungary, ****as in much of Eastern Europe, an overwhelming proportion of women work, many of which are in**** middle management and light industry.
A. as in much of Eastern Europe, an overwhelming proportion of women work, many of which are in
B. as with much of Eastern Europe, an overwhelming proportion of women works, many in
C. as in much of Eastern Europe, an overwhelming proportion of women work, many of them in
D. like much of Eastern Europe, an overwhelming proportion of women works, and many are
E. like much of Eastern Europe, an overwhelming proportion of women work, many are in

这一题答案选的C
这。。。   a proportion of women 后面跟 work????  难道  a proportion是副词????




254.    (27207-!-item-!-188;#058&002302)    (GWD-29-Q36)

Section 301 of the 1988 Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act enables the United States Trade Representative to single out a country as an unfair trader, begin trade negotiations with that country, and, if the negotiations do not conclude ****by the United States government's being satisfied, to impose**** sanctions.
A. by the United States government's being satisfied, to impose
B. by the United States government's satisfaction, impose
C. with the United States government's being satisfied, imposing
D. to the United States government's satisfaction, impose
E. to the United States government's satisfaction, imposing

这一题答案选D,我也选D,因为其他的都明显错误
可是做完题目之后回过头看,发现一个明显的问题
句中的begin trade XXXX 明明应该加个 to啊,  impose前面也明明应该加个 to啊。。,因为 主句不就是 XXXXX  enables XXX to single out XXXXXXX吗?这岂不是不是严格的平行了。。。  GWD怎么老是怪题
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-6-21 11:09:26 | 只看该作者
你说“有悖常理”,那么请问为什么你认为你原来学到的那些rule是“常理”?当xdf老师教你那些rule的时候,有给过让你信服的证明么?

如果曾给过证明,那ok,我们可以看看这个证明哪里出错了,或者他/她给出证明所依赖的条件不成立了(就好比牛顿力学所依赖的惯性参照系的assumption不成立了)。

如果XDF都没给出证明,直接让你记住。那咱从何谈起?

什么"必须接that",什么"being一定错",本来就是unjustified (invalid) conclusion. 如果XDF没有给出能让你信服的证明,你最好忘掉,就当你不知道。
板凳
发表于 2012-9-10 17:48:19 | 只看该作者
LS的姐姐说的太好了。。。。。。支持下。。。别全被教育机构的内定法则给害死了
地板
发表于 2012-10-1 16:28:25 | 只看该作者
你说“有悖常理”,那么请问为什么你认为你原来学到的那些rule是“常理”?当xdf老师教你那些rule的时候,有给过让你信服的证明么?

如果曾给过证明,那ok,我们可以看看这个证明哪里出错了,或者他/她给出证明所依赖的条件不成立了(就好比牛顿力学所依赖的惯性参照系的assumption不成立了)。

如果XDF都没给出证明,直接让你记住。那咱从何谈起?

什么"必须接that",什么"being一定错",本来就是unjustified (invalid) conclusion. 如果XDF没有给出能让你信服的证明,你最好忘掉,就当你不知道。
-- by 会员 babybearmm (2012/6/21 11:09:26)


baby姐姐说的对~可是我还是有问题啊。。。
我觉得在第一道题目中,prohibiting disclosure of its water purification methods to any company是argument的具体内容呀,而且一般情况下,我们只有在法律相关的内容后面使用v-ing,这里是不是使用that也可以呢??
希望baby姐姐指教~
5#
发表于 2012-10-1 17:15:30 | 只看该作者
你说“有悖常理”,那么请问为什么你认为你原来学到的那些rule是“常理”?当xdf老师教你那些rule的时候,有给过让你信服的证明么?

如果曾给过证明,那ok,我们可以看看这个证明哪里出错了,或者他/她给出证明所依赖的条件不成立了(就好比牛顿力学所依赖的惯性参照系的assumption不成立了)。

如果XDF都没给出证明,直接让你记住。那咱从何谈起?

什么"必须接that",什么"being一定错",本来就是unjustified (invalid) conclusion. 如果XDF没有给出能让你信服的证明,你最好忘掉,就当你不知道。
-- by 会员 babybearmm (2012/6/21 11:09:26)



baby姐姐说的对~可是我还是有问题啊。。。
我觉得在第一道题目中,prohibiting disclosure of its water purification methods to any company是argument的具体内容呀,而且一般情况下,我们只有在法律相关的内容后面使用v-ing,这里是不是使用that也可以呢??
希望baby姐姐指教~
-- by 会员 ainiAnnie (2012/10/1 16:28:25)



..................


prohibit that是错误的习语。。不能用。。这里考习语
6#
发表于 2012-10-2 00:47:15 | 只看该作者
你说“有悖常理”,那么请问为什么你认为你原来学到的那些rule是“常理”?当xdf老师教你那些rule的时候,有给过让你信服的证明么?

如果曾给过证明,那ok,我们可以看看这个证明哪里出错了,或者他/她给出证明所依赖的条件不成立了(就好比牛顿力学所依赖的惯性参照系的assumption不成立了)。

如果XDF都没给出证明,直接让你记住。那咱从何谈起?

什么"必须接that",什么"being一定错",本来就是unjustified (invalid) conclusion. 如果XDF没有给出能让你信服的证明,你最好忘掉,就当你不知道。
-- by 会员 babybearmm (2012/6/21 11:09:26)




baby姐姐说的对~可是我还是有问题啊。。。
我觉得在第一道题目中,prohibiting disclosure of its water purification methods to any company是argument的具体内容呀,而且一般情况下,我们只有在法律相关的内容后面使用v-ing,这里是不是使用that也可以呢??
希望baby姐姐指教~
-- by 会员 ainiAnnie (2012/10/1 16:28:25)




..................


prohibit that是错误的习语。。不能用。。这里考习语
-- by 会员 DUKB24 (2012/10/1 17:15:30)

我认为他不是想问prohibit that,而是想问that prohibit 代替prohibiting
7#
发表于 2012-10-2 01:57:33 | 只看该作者
鉴于大家只是批判了新东方 没有人解答 我就尝试一下

1 . xdf说的那个叫同位语从句  你这个题不是 而是定语从句

2. 请不要用这种似是而非的结论 og从来没说过since不能引导原因状语从句

3. B选项 有歧义

4. “比较用法里面明明有一个    XX  is n times + 比较单位 + of + YY 的用法”  你自己也说了是这样用的
 那未划线部分 three times the price 这就已经是这个形式了 后面用that定语从句 相当于你说的 of yy的部分
 what 本来就表示 something that的意思  如果放在这里 就变成 three times the price price that....

5. 我比较无语 a lot of people died。 这个句子看得懂吧?

6. 我又无语 第一个有了 后面几个都可以省略 你说的都加上也没错
8#
发表于 2012-10-9 13:26:22 | 只看该作者
[quote]
你说“有悖常理”,那么请问为什么你认为你原来学到的那些rule是“常理”?当xdf老师教你那些rule的时候,有给过让你信服的证明么?

如果曾给过证明,那ok,我们可以看看这个证明哪里出错了,或者他/她给出证明所依赖的条件不成立了(就好比牛顿力学所依赖的惯性参照系的assumption不成立了)。

如果XDF都没给出证明,直接让你记住。那咱从何谈起?

什么"必须接that",什么"being一定错",本来就是unjustified (invalid) conclusion. 如果XDF没有给出能让你信服的证明,你最好忘掉,就当你不知道。
-- by 会员 babybearmm (2012/6/21 11:09:26)





baby姐姐说的对~可是我还是有问题啊。。。
我觉得在第一道题目中,prohibiting disclosure of its water purification methods to any company是argument的具体内容呀,而且一般情况下,我们只有在法律相关的内容后面使用v-ing,这里是不是使用that也可以呢??
希望baby姐姐指教~
-- by 会员 ainiAnnie (2012/10/1 16:28:25)





..................


prohibit that是错误的习语。。不能用。。这里考习语
-- by 会员 DUKB24 (2012/10/1 17:15:30)


我好想问错了我想问的是
agreement that prohibit 和 agreement prohibiting that  是不是都可以~
9#
发表于 2012-10-9 15:28:34 | 只看该作者
[quote]
你说“有悖常理”,那么请问为什么你认为你原来学到的那些rule是“常理”?当xdf老师教你那些rule的时候,有给过让你信服的证明么?

如果曾给过证明,那ok,我们可以看看这个证明哪里出错了,或者他/她给出证明所依赖的条件不成立了(就好比牛顿力学所依赖的惯性参照系的assumption不成立了)。

如果XDF都没给出证明,直接让你记住。那咱从何谈起?

什么"必须接that",什么"being一定错",本来就是unjustified (invalid) conclusion. 如果XDF没有给出能让你信服的证明,你最好忘掉,就当你不知道。
-- by 会员 babybearmm (2012/6/21 11:09:26)






baby姐姐说的对~可是我还是有问题啊。。。
我觉得在第一道题目中,prohibiting disclosure of its water purification methods to any company是argument的具体内容呀,而且一般情况下,我们只有在法律相关的内容后面使用v-ing,这里是不是使用that也可以呢??
希望baby姐姐指教~
-- by 会员 ainiAnnie (2012/10/1 16:28:25)






..................


prohibit that是错误的习语。。不能用。。这里考习语
-- by 会员 DUKB24 (2012/10/1 17:15:30)



我好想问错了我想问的是
agreement that prohibit 和 agreement prohibiting that  是不是都可以~
-- by 会员 ainiAnnie (2012/10/9 13:26:22)



可以。。。你的prohibit打少了一个s
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-24 21:03
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部