ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1959|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[语文] (转)我认为的一个错误 NO4-8详细真题解析(阅读部分)

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-5-26 02:54:43 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
NO 8-1 Ragtime 一文It has sometimes been charged that ragtime is mechanical. For instance, Wilfred Mellers comments, “rags were transferred to the pianola roll and, even if not played by a machine, should be played like a machine, with meticulous precision.” However, there is no reason to assume that ragtime is inherently mechanical simply because commercial manufacturers applied a mechanical recording method to ragtime, the only way to record pianos at that date. Ragtime’s is not a mechanical precision, and it is not precision limited to the style of performance. It arises from ragtime’s following a well-defined form and obeying simple rules within that form.

20.   The author rejects the argument that ragtime is a mechanical music because that argument
(A) overlooks the precision required of the ragtime player
(B) does not accurately describe the sound of ragtime pianola music
(C) confuses the means of recording and the essential character of the music
(D) exaggerates the influence of the performance style of professional ragtime players on the reputation of the genre
(E) improperly identifies commercial ragtime music with the subtler classic ragtime style

我以为答案的确应该是C。
作者分析机械的指责时,首先说明了这是一个由于当时商业recording方式导致的一个误区,然后指出precision是的确其一个特点,以排除可能的误解,称Ragtime’s is not a mechanical precision,然后进一步阐述其precision 在于哪里。作者讲误区就是为了讲其precision的特点的。并引出了下文详细地讲formal structure.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-5-29 09:50:31 | 只看该作者
我觉得应该也是选C,答案不是吗
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-5 11:54
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部