Charles Lindbergh, for his attempt at a solo transatlantic flight, was very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane, he therefore refused to carry even a pound of mail, despite being offered $1,000 to do so.
183.(GWD-6-Q22)Charles Lindbergh, for his attempt at a solo transatlantic flight, was very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane, he therefore refused to carry even a pound of mail, despite being offered $1,000 to do so.
A.Charles Lindbergh, for his attempt at a solo transatlantic flight, was very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane, he therefore
B.When Charles Lindbergh was attempting his solo transatlantic flight, being very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane, he
C.Since he was very reluctant to carry any extra weight on his plane when he was attempting his solo transatlantic flight, so Charles Lindbergh
D.Being very reluctant to carry any extra weight on his plane when he attempted his solo transatlantic flight was the reason that Charles Lindbergh(E)
E.Very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane when he attempted his solo transatlantic flight, Charles Lindbergh
题目释义:Very reluctant to have any extra weight ….., Charles Lindbergh refused to …….., despite…..…
主语是Charles Lindbergh,形容词引导的不定式前置,修饰主语,谓语为refuse to do sth,despite引导的状语从句,修饰谓语,表转折。
我在国外网站找到很好的解释,直接粘过来了~ Being heavily committed to a course of action, especially one that has worked well in the past, is likely to make an executive miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear. in first OG example... What "is likely to make an executive miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear"? "Being heavily committed to a course of action, especially one that has worked well in the past" This answer makes sense. On the other hand...
What "was the reason that Charles Lindbergh refused to carry even a pound of mail"? "Being very reluctant to carry any extra weight on his plane" This is just not how you answer a question like this. When someone asks you "what is the reason that X happened?", the answer is not "being Y". This is why "being" cannot be used as a subject here. The "being" phrase here would be more appropriate as a modifier for Charles Lindbergh if the sentence were restructured to accommodate that.