ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Some scientists have been critical of the laboratory tests conducted by the Federal Drug Administration on the grounds that the amounts of suspected carcinogens fed to animals far exceeds those that humans could consume

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 7440|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

amounts of的问题Prep08-165

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-8-17 21:38:32 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
请问amount of/amounts of的用法,网上查了下后面应该都是跟不可数名词,可是这道题后面跟了复数名词carcinogens???
谢谢回答

165. (OG10-243)
Some scientists have been critical of the laboratory tests conducted by the Federal Drug Administration on the grounds that the amounts of suspected carcinogens fed to animals far exceeds those that humans could consume
A.    far exceeds those that humans could consume
B.    exceeds by far those humans can consume
C.    far exceeds those humans are able to consume
D.    exceed by far those able to be consumed by humans    
E.    far exceed those that humans could consume
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-8-17 21:46:07 | 只看该作者
lz,句子主語是the amounts... 謂語是複數
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-8-17 21:51:57 | 只看该作者
恩,这点明白,但为什么后面跟的是可数名词carcinogens???
地板
发表于 2011-8-17 23:48:44 | 只看该作者
我在网上和电子词典上也查到了the amounts of后面跟复数的情况。
5#
发表于 2011-8-18 02:04:54 | 只看该作者
the amounts of suspected carcinogens 这里的核心词是amounts,指数量,注意amounts前面有the! 而不是像a large amout of后面跟不可数名词时,核心词是后面的名词。

这句话是说,致癌物的“数量”超过了。。。注意句意就可以了。
6#
发表于 2011-8-18 09:26:25 | 只看该作者
我选E,也不是根据所谓的amounts来判定的,纯粹靠主谓用法

Some scientists have been critical of the laboratory tests conducted by the Federal Drug Administration on the grounds that the amounts of suspected carcinogens fed to animals far exceeds those that humans could consume
A.    far exceeds those that humans could consume==>exceeds说明前面那个数量是单数,但是those就应该指代那个数量但是用的是复数,所以不一致错误
C.    far exceeds those humans are able to consume==>同A的错误
E.    far exceed those that humans could consume==>说明前面那个数量是复数,后面的those指代复数,正确

别死记啊,否则很容易被GMAC欺骗绕进去的
7#
发表于 2011-8-18 10:40:37 | 只看该作者
说实话 amount 和amounts直接的区别,还是真的不知道是怎么区别的,虽然这题比较简单。请后续的NN解释下 哈
8#
发表于 2015-6-14 09:16:23 | 只看该作者
清飞扬 发表于 2011-8-18 09:26
我选E,也不是根据所谓的amounts来判定的,纯粹靠主谓用法Some scientists have been critical of the labo ...

同意!               
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-26 23:50
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部