The first detailed study of magpie attacks in Australia indicates that by the time they had reached adulthood, 98 percent of men and 75 percent of women born in the country have been attacked by the birds
The first detailed study of magpie attacks in Australia indicates that by the time they had reached adulthood, 98 percent of men and 75 percent of women born in the country have been attacked by the birds.
A.by the time they had reached adulthood, 98 percent of men and 75 percent of women born in the country have been attacked by the birds
B.by the time they reach adulthood, 98 percent of men and 75 percent of women, who were born in the country, had been attacked by the birds
C.by the time they reached adulthood, 98 percent of men and 75 percent of women born in the country had been attacked by the birds
D.98 percent of men and 75 percent of women that were born in the country were attacked by the birds by the time they reach adulthood E.98 percent of men and 75 percent of women who were born in the country, by the time they reached adulthood had been attacked by the birds
选C没问题,可是关于B选项的解释有疑问 “reach的时态错误,同时使得had been attacked没有时间对比来说明be attack是发生在过去的过去;Who引导的定语从句是非限制性修饰,使得逻辑含义错误”
1.reach虽然不如reached好,但是也能和had been attacked进行时间对比来说明动作发生在过去啊,为什么解释说不能对比? 2.此处用非限制性修饰为什么会使逻辑含义错误?
for 2) 两个意思不一样 简单来说 30% women, who were born in the country, 是说30%的女人, 这些女人出生在这个城市 30% women born in the country 是说 这个城市出生的 30%的女人 之所以说逻辑错误, 我想可能是这样, 30%的女人,是把全世界所有的女人都算上了, 可是这个30%比较特殊, 因为这些女人都是出生在这个城市的 但是 30% women born in the country 则是 以这个城市出生的人为基数, 因此, 我感觉 后面的更靠谱些
for 2) 两个意思不一样 简单来说 30% women, who were born in the country, 是说30%的女人, 这些女人出生在这个城市 30% women born in the country 是说 这个城市出生的 30%的女人 之所以说逻辑错误, 我想可能是这样, 30%的女人,是把全世界所有的女人都算上了, 可是这个30%比较特殊, 因为这些女人都是出生在这个城市的 但是 30% women born in the country 则是 以这个城市出生的人为基数, 因此, 我感觉 后面的更靠谱些